The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Plaques in the Human Thoracic Aorta: A Comparison With Transesophageal Echocardiography
Abstract
Background —The structure and composition of aortic atherosclerotic plaques are associated with the risk of future cardiovascular events. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may allow accurate visualization and characterization of aortic plaques. Methods and Results —We developed a noninvasive MR method, free of motion and blood flow artifacts, for submillimeter imaging of the thoracic aortic wall. MR imaging was performed on a clinical MR system in 10 patients with aortic plaques identified by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Plaque composition, extent, and size were assessed from T1-, proton density–, and T2- weighted images. Comparison of 25 matched MR and TEE cross-sectional aortic plaque images showed a strong correlation for plaque composition (χ 2 =43.5, P <0.0001; 80% overall agreement; n=25) and mean maximum plaque thickness ( r =0.88, n=25; 4.56±0.21 mm by MR and 4.62±0.31 mm by TEE). Overall aortic plaque extent as assessed by TEE and MR was also statistically significant (χ 2 =61.77, P <0.0001; 80% overall agreement; n=30 regions). Conclusions —This study demonstrates that noninvasive MR evaluation of the aorta compares well with TEE imaging for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque thickness, extent, and composition. This MR method may prove useful for the in vivo study of aortic atherosclerosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Risk factors and atherosclerotic lesions. A review of autopsy studies
Solberg, L. A., & Strong, J. P. (1983) · Arteriosclerosis: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association, Inc. · doi:10.1161/01.atv.3.3.187 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Goldstein, S. A., Evangelista, A., Abbara, S., Arai, A., Asch, F. M., Badano, L. P., Bolen, M. A., Connolly, H. M., Cuéllar-Calàbria, H., Czerny, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.015 · Cited by 641
Corti, R., Fayad, Z. A., Fuster, V., Worthley, S. G., Helft, G., Chesebro, J., Mercuri, M., & Badimon, J. J. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.104.3.249 · Cited by 478
Self-citationBluemke, D. A., Achenbach, S., Budoff, M., Gerber, T. C., Gersh, B., Hillis, L. D., Hundley, W. G., Manning, W. J., Printz, B. F., Stuber, M., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.189695 · Cited by 461
Hundley, W. G., Kitzman, D. W., Morgan, T. M., Hamilton, C. A., Darty, S. N., Stewart, K. P., Herrington, D. M., Link, K. M., & Little, W. C. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01447-4 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Fayad, Z. A., Nahar, T., Fallon, J. T., Goldman, M., Aguinaldo, J. G., Badimon, J. J., Shinnar, M., Chesebro, J. H., & Fuster, V.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-05-30
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2503-2509
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1969803999
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Plaques in the Human Thoracic Aorta: A Comparison With Transesophageal Echocardiography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.21.2503
- The paper
- Fayad, Z. A., Nahar, T., Fallon, J. T., Goldman, M., Aguinaldo, J. G., Badimon, J. J., Shinnar, M., Chesebro, J. H., & Fuster, V. (2000). In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Plaques in the Human Thoracic Aorta: A Comparison With Transesophageal Echocardiography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.21.2503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.