The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extent and Direction of Arterial Remodeling in Stable Versus Unstable Coronary Syndromes: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study
Open accessAbstract
Background —The morphological characteristics of coronary plaques in patients with stable versus unstable coronary syndromes have been described in vivo with intravascular ultrasound, but the relationship between arterial remodeling and clinical presentation is not well known. Methods and Results —We studied 85 patients with unstable and 46 patients with stable coronary syndromes using intravascular ultrasound before coronary intervention. The lesion site and a proximal reference site were analyzed. The remodeling ratio (RR) was defined as the ratio of the external elastic membrane (EEM) area at the lesion to that at the proximal reference site. Positive remodeling was defined as an RR >1.05 and negative remodeling as an RR <0.95. Plaque area (13.9±5.5 versus 11.1±4.8 mm 2 ; P =0.005), EEM area (16.1±6.2 versus 13.0±4.8 mm 2 ; P =0.004), and the RR (1.06±0.2 versus 0.94±0.2; P =0.008) were significantly greater at target lesions in patients with unstable syndromes than in patients with stable syndromes. Positive remodeling was more frequent in unstable than in stable lesions (51.8% versus 19.6%), whereas negative remodeling was more frequent in stable lesions (56.5% versus 31.8%) ( P =0.001). Conclusions —Positive remodeling and larger plaque areas were associated with unstable clinical presentation, whereas negative remodeling was more common in patients with stable clinical presentation. This association between the extent of remodeling and clinical presentation may reflect a greater tendency of plaques with positive remodeling to cause unstable coronary syndromes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thrombosis and Acute Coronary-Artery Lesions in Sudden Cardiac Ischemic Death
Davies, M. J., & Thomas, A. (1984) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198405033101801 · Cited by 1,694
Cited by
Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease
Libby, P., & Theroux, P. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.537878 · Cited by 1,965
Chatzizisis, Y. S., Coskun, A. U., Jonas, M., Edelman, E. R., Feldman, C. L., & Stone, P. H. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.059 · Cited by 1,483
Newby, A. C. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2003 · Cited by 817
Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture
Badimon, L., & Vilahur, G. (2014) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12296 · Cited by 697
Calcium Density of Coronary Artery Plaque and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events
Criqui, M. H., Denenberg, J. O., Ix, J. H., McClelland, R. L., Wassel, C. L., Rifkin, D. E., Carr, J. J., Budoff, M. J., & Allison, M. A. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282535 · Cited by 642
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenhagen, P., Ziada, K. M., Kapadia, S. R., Crowe, T. D., Nissen, S. E., & Tuzcu, E. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-02-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 598-603
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1979939384
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extent and Direction of Arterial Remodeling in Stable Versus Unstable Coronary Syndromes: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.6.598
- The paper
- Schoenhagen, P., Ziada, K. M., Kapadia, S. R., Crowe, T. D., Nissen, S. E., & Tuzcu, E. M. (2000). Extent and Direction of Arterial Remodeling in Stable Versus Unstable Coronary Syndromes: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.6.598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.