Cited by 642Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Calcium Density of Coronary Artery Plaque and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events

Open access
Criqui, Michael H., Denenberg, Julie O., Ix, Joachim H., McClelland, Robyn L., Wassel, Christina L., Rifkin, Dena E., Carr, Jeffrey J., Budoff, Matthew J. +1 more·2014·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Coronary artery calcium (CAC), measured by computed tomography (CT), has strong predictive value for incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. The standard CAC score is the Agatston, which is weighted upward for greater calcium density. However, some data suggest increased plaque calcium density may be protective for CVD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the independent associations of CAC volume and CAC density with incident CVD events. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, prospective observational MESA study (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), conducted at 6 US field centers of 3398 men and women from 4 race/ethnicity groups; non-Hispanic white, African American, Hispanic, and Chinese. Participants were aged 45-84 years, free of known CVD at baseline, had CAC greater than 0 on their baseline CT, and were followed up through October 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and all CVD events RESULTS: During a median of 7.6 years of follow-up, there were 175 CHD events and an additional 90 other CVD events for a total of 265 CVD events. With both lnCAC volume and CAC density scores in the same multivariable model, the lnCAC volume score showed an independent association with incident CHD, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.47-2.23) per standard deviation (SD = 1.6) increase, absolute risk increase 6.1 per 1000 person-years, and for CVD an HR of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.42-1.98) per SD increase, absolute risk increase 7.9 per 1000 person-years. Conversely, the CAC density score showed an independent inverse association, with an HR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.91) per SD (SD = 0.7) increase for CHD, absolute risk decrease 5.5 per 1000 person-years, and an HR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.60-0.85) per SD increase for CVD, absolute risk decrease 8.2 per 1000 person years. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed significantly improved risk prediction with the addition of the density score to a model containing the volume score for both CHD and CVD. In the intermediate CVD risk group, the area under the curve for CVD increased from 0.53 (95% CI, 0.48-0.59) to 0.59 (95% CI, 0.54-0.64), P = .02. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: CAC volume was positively and independently associated with CHD and CVD risk. At any level of CAC volume, CAC density was inversely and significantly associated with CHD and CVD risk. The role of CAC density should be considered when evaluating current CAC scoring systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2013.282535

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in coronary artery calcium area increases the risk of cardiovascular events, whereas an increase in density lowers the risk of cardiovascular events.

    “The CAC score is a multiplication of area and density, whereby an increase in area increases the risk of cardiovascular events and an increase in density lowers the risk of cardiovascular events 19 .”
  • A high CAC area is directly associated with CVD risk, but increased density of CAC is inversely associated with CVD risk.

    “Others have shown that a high CAC area is directly associated with CVD risk, but that increased density of CAC is inversely associated with CVD risk 19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Agatston AS Janowitz WR Hildner FJ Zusmer NR Viamonte M Jr Detrano R Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 1990 15 4 827 832 2407762
  2. [2]Yeboah J McClelland RL Polonsky TS Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals JAMA 2012 308 8 788 795 22910756 PMC4141475
  3. [3]Hodgson JM Reddy KG Suneja R Nair RN Lesnefsky EJ Sheehan HM Intracoronary ultrasound imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 1993 21 1 35 44 8417074
  4. [4]Schoenhagen P Ziada KM Kapadia SR Crowe TD Nissen SE Tuzcu EM Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes Circulation 2000 101 6 598 603 10673250
  5. [5]Leber AW Knez A White CW Composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction and stable angina pectoris determined by contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography Am J Cardiol 2003 91 6 714 718 12633805
  6. [6]Shemesh J Apter S Itzchak Y Motro M Coronary calcification compared in patients with acute versus in those with chronic coronary events by using dual-sector spiral CT Radiology 2003 226 2 483 488 12563143
  7. [7]Ehara S Kobayashi Y Yoshiyama M Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction Circulation 2004 110 22 3424 3429 15557374
  8. [9]Houslay ES Cowell SJ Prescott RJ Progressive coronary calcification despite intensive lipid-lowering treatment Heart 2006 92 9 1207 1212 16449511 PMC1861190
  9. [10]Terry JG Carr JJ Kouba EO Effect of simvastatin (80 mg) on coronary and abdominal aortic arterial calcium (from the coronary artery calcification treatment with zocor [CATZ] study) Am J Cardiol 2007 99 12 1714 1717 17560880
  10. [11]Inoue K Motoyama S Sarai M Serial coronary CT angiography-verified changes in plaque characteristics as an end point JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 3 7 691 698 20633846
  11. [12]Bild DE Bluemke DA Burke GL Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design Am J Epidemiol 2002 156 9 871 881 12397006
  12. [14]Carr JJ Nelson JC Wong ND Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies Radiology 2005 234 1 35 43 15618373
  13. [15]Nelson JC Kronmal RA Carr JJ Measuring coronary calcium on CT images adjusted for attenuation differences Radiology 2005 235 2 403 414 15858082
  14. [16]Detrano RC Anderson M Nelson J Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility—MESA study Radiology 2005 236 2 477 484 15972340
  15. [17]Folsom AR Kronmal RA Detrano RC Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence Arch Intern Med 2008 168 12 1333 1339 18574091 PMC2555989
  16. [19]Pencina MJ D'Agostino RB Sr D'Agostino RB Jr Vasan RS Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond Stat Med 2008 27 2 157 172 17569110
  17. [20]Detrano R Guerci AD Carr JJ Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups N Engl J Med 2008 358 13 1336 1345 18367736
  18. [21]Budoff MJ McClelland RL Nasir K Cardiovascular events with absent or minimal coronary calcification Am Heart J 2009 158 4 554 561 19781414 PMC2766514
  19. [22]Detrano R Hsiai T Wang S Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 1996 27 2 285 290 8557895
  20. [23]Sangiorgi G Rumberger JA Severson A Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 31 1 126 133 9426030
  21. [24]Arguelles W Llabre MM Penedo FJ Does change in cardiometabolic risk factors relate to change in coronary artery calcification? findings from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) [AHA abstract 9110] Circulation 2011 124 A9110 http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/124/21_MeetingAbstracts/A9110?sid=80cfeb09-585f-401b-9cdc-5467292b4cc0. Accessed November 13, 2013
  22. [25]Brown ER Kronmal RA Bluemke DA Coronary calcium coverage score: determination, correlates, and predictive accuracy in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Radiology 2008 247 3 669 675 18413889 PMC5410932
  23. [26]Williams M Shaw LJ Raggi P Prognostic value of number and site of calcified coronary lesions compared with the total score JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008 1 1 61 69 19356407
  24. [27]Shemesh J Henschke CI Shaham D Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease Radiology 2010 257 2 541 548 20829542
  25. [28]Liang CJ Budoff MJ Kaufman JD Kronmal RA Brown ER An alternative method for quantifying coronary artery calcification BMC Med Imaging 2012 12 14 22747658 PMC3443418
  26. [29]Allison MA Criqui MH Wright CM Patterns and risk factors for systemic calcified atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004 24 2 331 336 14656730
  27. [30]McClelland RL Chung H Detrano R Post W Kronmal RA Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age Circulation 2006 113 1 30 37 16365194
  28. [31]Hoffmann U Massaro JM Fox CS Manders E O'Donnell CJ Defining normal distributions of coronary artery calcium in women and men (from the Framingham Heart Study) Am J Cardiol 2008 102 9 1136 1141 e1 18940279 PMC3065378

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Criqui, M. H., Denenberg, J. O., Ix, J. H., McClelland, R. L., Wassel, C. L., Rifkin, D. E., Carr, J. J., Budoff, M. J., & Allison, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • The Lundquist Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Criqui, Michael H.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2014-01-15
Volume
311
Issue
3
Pages
271
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2014951154
Cited by
642
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 3
FWCI
32.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95164-17-0-1, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc095169-003, n01hc95162-31-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc95159-40-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC095169, N01-HC-095165, (N01-HC-95163, N01 HC095163, N01 HC-95161, N01 HC95165, N01HC95164, N01-HC-095159, N01-HC-095162, N01-HC-095161, N01-HC-095160, N01 HC095164, N01 HC-95162, N01 HC95169)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK091521)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, calcium density, coronary plaque, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular events, Agatston score, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, risk prediction, racial and ethnic differences, atherosclerosis, risk reclassification, risk calibration, risk mitigation, risk discrimination
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Calcium, Coronary Disease, Coronary Vessels, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Risk, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Atherosclerosis, Plaque, Atherosclerotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review