The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept
Open accessAbstract
Background —Fluid energy loss across stenotic aortic valves is influenced by factors other than the valve effective orifice area (EOA). We propose a new index that will provide a more accurate estimate of this energy loss. Methods and Results —An experimental model was designed to measure EOA and energy loss in 2 fixed stenoses and 7 bioprosthetic valves for different flow rates and 2 different aortic sizes (25 and 38 mm). The results showed that the relationship between EOA and energy loss is influenced by both flow rate and aortic cross-sectional area (A A ) and that the energy loss is systematically higher (15±2%) in the large aorta. The coefficient (EOA×A A )/(A A −EOA) accurately predicted the energy loss in all situations ( r 2 =0.98). This coefficient is more closely related to the increase in left ventricular workload than EOA. To account for varying flow rates, the coefficient was indexed for body surface area in a retrospective study of 138 patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. The energy loss index measured by Doppler echocardiography was superior to the EOA in predicting the end points, which were defined as death or aortic valve replacement. An energy loss index ≤0.52 cm 2 /m 2 was the best predictor of adverse outcomes (positive predictive value of 67%). Conclusions —This new energy loss index has the potential to reflect the severity of aortic stenosis better than EOA. Further prospective studies are necessary to establish the relevance of this index in terms of clinical outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Otto, C. M., Burwash, I. G., Legget, M. E., Munt, B. I., Fujioka, M., Healy, N. L., Kraft, C. D., Miyake-Hull, C. Y., & Schwaegler, R. G. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.9.2262 · Cited by 1,146
Cited by
Hachicha, Z., Dumesnil, J. G., Bogaty, P., & Pibarot, P. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.668681 · Cited by 959
Self-citationPibarot, P., & Dumesnil, J. G. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00859-7 · Cited by 674
Self-citationBriand, M., Dumesnil, J. G., Kadem, L., Tongue, A. G., Rieu, R., Garcia, D., & Pibarot, P. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.081 · Cited by 493
Self-citationHachicha, Z., Dumesnil, J. G., & Pibarot, P. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.079 · Cited by 356
Self-citationDumesnil, J. G., Pibarot, P., & Carabello, B. (2010) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia, D., Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G., Sakr, F., & Durand, L.-G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-02-22
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 765-771
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2160337198
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.7.765
- The paper
- Garcia, D., Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G., Sakr, F., & Durand, L.-G. (2000). Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.7.765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.