Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept

Open access
Garcia, Damien, Pibarot, Philippe, Dumesnil, Jean G., Sakr, Frédéric, Durand, Louis-Gilles·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Fluid energy loss across stenotic aortic valves is influenced by factors other than the valve effective orifice area (EOA). We propose a new index that will provide a more accurate estimate of this energy loss. Methods and Results —An experimental model was designed to measure EOA and energy loss in 2 fixed stenoses and 7 bioprosthetic valves for different flow rates and 2 different aortic sizes (25 and 38 mm). The results showed that the relationship between EOA and energy loss is influenced by both flow rate and aortic cross-sectional area (A A ) and that the energy loss is systematically higher (15±2%) in the large aorta. The coefficient (EOA×A A )/(A A −EOA) accurately predicted the energy loss in all situations ( r 2 =0.98). This coefficient is more closely related to the increase in left ventricular workload than EOA. To account for varying flow rates, the coefficient was indexed for body surface area in a retrospective study of 138 patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. The energy loss index measured by Doppler echocardiography was superior to the EOA in predicting the end points, which were defined as death or aortic valve replacement. An energy loss index ≤0.52 cm 2 /m 2 was the best predictor of adverse outcomes (positive predictive value of 67%). Conclusions —This new energy loss index has the potential to reflect the severity of aortic stenosis better than EOA. Further prospective studies are necessary to establish the relevance of this index in terms of clinical outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.101.7.765

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Garcia, D., Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G., Sakr, F., & Durand, L.-G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-02-22
Volume
101
Issue
7
Pages
765-771
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2160337198
Cited by
347
References
1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.7.765
The paper
Garcia, D., Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G., Sakr, F., & Durand, L.-G. (2000). Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.7.765

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.