Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Trials in Coronary Angiogenesis: Issues, Problems, Consensus: An Expert Panel Summary

Simons, Michael, Bonow, Robert O., Chronos, Nicolas A., Cohen, David J., Giordano, Frank J., Hammond, H. Kirk, Laham, Roger J., Li, William, Pike, Marylin, Sellke, Frank W., Stegmann, Thomas J., Udelson, James E., Rosengart, Todd K.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Abstract—The rapid development of angiogenic growth factor therapy for patients with advanced ischemic heart disease over the last 5 years offers hope of a new treatment strategy based on generation of new blood supply in the diseased heart. However, as the field of therapeutic coronary angiogenesis is maturing from basic and preclinical investigations to clinical trials, many new and presently unresolved issues are coming into focus. These include in-depth understanding of the biology of angiogenesis, selection of appropriate patient populations for clinical trials, choice of therapeutic end points and means of their assessment, choice of therapeutic strategy (gene versus protein delivery), route of administration, and the side effect profile. The present article presents a summary statement of a panel of experts actively working in the field, convened by the Angiogenesis Foundation and the Angiogenesis Research Center during the 72nd meeting of the American Heart Association to define and achieve a consensus on the challenges facing development of therapeutic angiogenesis for coronary disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.11.e73

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Simons, M., Bonow, R. O., Chronos, N. A., Cohen, D. J., Giordano, F. J., Hammond, H. K., Laham, R. J., Li, W., Pike, M., Sellke, F. W., Stegmann, T. J., Udelson, J. E., & Rosengart, T. K.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-09-12
Volume
102
Issue
11
Pages
E73-86
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2137982969
Cited by
459
References
3
FWCI
38.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Trials in Coronary Angiogenesis: Issues, Problems, Consensus: An Expert Panel Summary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.11.e73
The paper
Simons, M., Bonow, R. O., Chronos, N. A., Cohen, D. J., Giordano, F. J., Hammond, H. K., Laham, R. J., Li, W., Pike, M., Sellke, F. W., Stegmann, T. J., Udelson, J. E., & Rosengart, T. K. (2000). Clinical Trials in Coronary Angiogenesis: Issues, Problems, Consensus: An Expert Panel Summary. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.11.e73

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.