Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship Between Circadian Blood Pressure Patterns and Progression of Early Carotid Atherosclerosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study

Open access
Sander, Dirk, Kukla, Christian, Klingelhöfer, Jürgen, Winbeck, Kerstin, Conrad, Bastian·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular damage. The results of several studies suggest that target organ damage is greater in hypertensive persons with high blood pressure variability. Methods and Results —During 3.3 years of follow-up, we studied the relationship between circadian blood pressure changes and the progression of early carotid atherosclerosis in 286 patients aged >55 years. Blood pressure patterns were evaluated with a long-term blood pressure monitor, and the extent of atherosclerosis was measured as the intima-media wall thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery. Patients were subdivided according to blood pressure variability. The progression of IMT was significantly greater in the patients with increased systolic blood pressure variability (0.11 mm/y [95% CI 0.09 to 0.14] versus 0.05 mm/y [0.03 to 0.08]; P <0.005) even after adjustment for other risk factors. Multivariate regression analysis revealed the daytime systolic blood pressure variability to be the best predictor for the progression of IMT. Raised daytime systolic blood pressure variability (>15 mm Hg) is associated with an increased relative risk of the development of early atherosclerosis (3.9 [1.4 to 11.1]; P <0.01) and of cardiovascular events (1.87 [1.08 to 3.20]; P <0.01). Conclusions —The daytime systolic blood pressure variability is a strong predictor of early carotid atherosclerosis progression and is useful to define the risk-benefit ratio of therapeutic approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1536

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Sander, D., Kukla, C., Klingelhöfer, J., Winbeck, K., & Conrad, B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-09-26
Volume
102
Issue
13
Pages
1536-1541
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2157562960
Cited by
405
References
4
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship Between Circadian Blood Pressure Patterns and Progression of Early Carotid Atherosclerosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1536
The paper
Sander, D., Kukla, C., Klingelhöfer, J., Winbeck, K., & Conrad, B. (2000). Relationship Between Circadian Blood Pressure Patterns and Progression of Early Carotid Atherosclerosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1536

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.