The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inhibition of the Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger With Cariporide to Prevent Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Ischemic Situations: Main Results of the GUARDIAN Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background—The transmembrane sodium/hydrogen exchanger maintains myocardial cell pH integrity during myocardial ischemia but paradoxically may precipitate cell necrosis. The development of cariporide, a potent and specific inhibitor of the exchanger, prompted this investigation of the potential of the drug to prevent myocardial cell necrosis. Methods and Results—A total of 11 590 patients with unstable angina or non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or undergoing high-risk percutaneous or surgical revascularization were randomized to receive placebo or 1 of 3 doses of cariporide for the period of risk. The trial failed to document benefit of cariporide over placebo on the primary end point of death or MI assessed after 36 days. Doses of 20 and 80 mg every 8 hours had no effect, whereas a dose of 120 mg was associated with a 10% risk reduction (98% CI 5.5% to 23.4%,P=0.12). With this dose, benefit was limited to patients undergoing bypass surgery (risk reduction 25%, 95% CI 3.1% to 41.5%,P=0.03) and was maintained after 6 months. No effect was seen on mortality. The rate of Q-wave MI was reduced by 32% across all entry diagnostic groups (2.6% versus 1.8%,P=0.03), but the rate of non–Q-wave MI was reduced only in patients undergoing surgery (7.1% versus 3.8%,P=0.005). There were no increases in clinically serious adverse events. Conclusions—No significant benefit of cariporide could be demonstrated across a wide range of clinical situations of risk. The trial documented safety of the drug and suggested that a high degree of inhibition of the exchanger could prevent cell necrosis in settings of ischemia-reperfusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yellon, D. M., & Hausenloy, D. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra071667 · Cited by 3,797
Lytvyn, Y., Bjornstad, P., Udell, J. A., Lovshin, J. A., & Cherney, D. Z. I. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.030012 · Cited by 459
Myocardial Protection at a Crossroads: The Need for Translation Into Clinical Therapy
Bolli, R., Becker, L., Gross, G., Mentzer, R., Balshaw, D., & Lathrop, D. A. (2004) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000137171.97172.d7 · Cited by 428
Traditional and emerging roles for the SLC9 na+/H+ exchangers
Fuster, D. G., & Alexander, R. T. (2014) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00424-013-1408-8 · Cited by 159
Myocardial ‘no-reflow’ — diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment.
Wong, D. T. L., Puri, R., Richardson, J. D., Worthley, M. I., & Worthley, S. G. (2013) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.049 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Théroux, P., Chaitman, B. R., Danchin, N., Erhardt, L., Meinertz, T., Schroeder, J. S., Tognoni, G., White, H. D., Willerson, J. T., & Jessel, A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-12-19
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3032-3038
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2113440073
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of the Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger With Cariporide to Prevent Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Ischemic Situations: Main Results of the GUARDIAN Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3032
- The paper
- Théroux, P., Chaitman, B. R., Danchin, N., Erhardt, L., Meinertz, T., Schroeder, J. S., Tognoni, G., White, H. D., Willerson, J. T., & Jessel, A. (2000). Inhibition of the Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger With Cariporide to Prevent Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Ischemic Situations: Main Results of the GUARDIAN Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.