Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Left Ventricular or Biventricular Pacing Improves Cardiac Function at Diminished Energy Cost in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Left Bundle-Branch Block

Nelson, Gregory S., Berger, Ronald D., Fetics, Barry J., Talbot, Maurice, Spinelli, Julio C., Hare, Joshua M., Kass, David A.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background—Left ventricular or biventricular pacing/stimulation can acutely improve systolic function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and intraventricular conduction delay by resynchronizing contraction. Most heart failure therapies directly enhancing systolic function do so while concomitantly increasing myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO 2). We hypothesized that pacing/stimulation, in contrast, incurs systolic benefits without raising energy demand. Methods and Results—Ten DCM patients with left bundle-branch block (ejection fraction 20±3%, QRS duration179±3 ms, mean±SEM) underwent cardiac catheterization to measure ventricular and aortic pressure, coronary blood flow, arterial–coronary sinus oxygen difference (ΔAVO 2), and MV̇O 2. Data were measured under sinus rhythm or with left ventricular or biventricular pacing/stimulation at the same heart rate. These results were then contrasted to intravenous dobutamine (n=7) titrated to match systolic changes during LV pacing. Systolic function rose quickly and substantially from LV pacing (18±4% rise in arterial pulse pressure, which correlates with cardiac output, and 43±6% increase in dP/dt max; both P<0.01). However, ΔAVO 2 and MV̇O 2 declined −4±2% and −8±6.5%, respectively (both P<0.05). Similar results were obtained with biventricular activation. In contrast, dobutamine raised dP/dt max 37±6%, accompanied by a 22±11% rise in per-beat MV̇O 2(P<0.05 versus pacing). Conclusions—Ventricular resynchronization by left ventricular or biventricular pacing/stimulation in DCM patients with left bundle-branch block acutely enhances systolic function while modestly lowering energy cost. This should prove valuable for treating DCM patients with basal dyssynchrony.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3053

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, G. S., Berger, R. D., Fetics, B. J., Talbot, M., Spinelli, J. C., Hare, J. M., & Kass, D. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-12-19
Volume
102
Issue
25
Pages
3053-3059
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2039506736
Cited by
758
References
2
FWCI
28.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Left Ventricular or Biventricular Pacing Improves Cardiac Function at Diminished Energy Cost in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Left Bundle-Branch Block. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3053
The paper
Nelson, G. S., Berger, R. D., Fetics, B. J., Talbot, M., Spinelli, J. C., Hare, J. M., & Kass, D. A. (2000). Left Ventricular or Biventricular Pacing Improves Cardiac Function at Diminished Energy Cost in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Left Bundle-Branch Block. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.