The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive In Vivo Human Coronary Artery Lumen and Wall Imaging Using Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Background —High-resolution MRI has the potential to noninvasively image the human coronary artery wall and define the degree and nature of coronary artery disease. Coronary artery imaging by MR has been limited by artifacts related to blood flow and motion and by low spatial resolution. Methods and Results —We used a noninvasive black-blood (BB) MRI (BB-MR) method, free of motion and blood-flow artifacts, for high-resolution (down to 0.46 mm in-plane resolution and 3-mm slice thickness) imaging of the coronary artery lumen and wall. In vivo BB-MR of both normal and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries was performed in 13 subjects: 8 normal subjects and 5 patients with coronary artery disease. The average coronary wall thickness for each cross-sectional image was 0.75±0.17 mm (range, 0.55 to 1.0 mm) in the normal subjects. MR images of coronary arteries in patients with ≥40% stenosis as assessed by x-ray angiography showed localized wall thickness of 4.38±0.71 mm (range, 3.30 to 5.73 mm). The difference in maximum wall thickness between the normal subjects and patients was statistically significant ( P <0.0001). Conclusions —In vivo high-spatial-resolution BB-MR provides a unique new method to noninvasively image and assess the morphological features of human coronary arteries. This may allow the identification of atherosclerotic disease before it is symptomatic. Further studies are necessary to identify the different plaque components and to assess lesions in asymptomatic patients and their outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inflammation as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor
Willerson, J. T., & Ridker, P. M. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000129535.04194.38 · Cited by 1,304
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Goldstein, S. A., Evangelista, A., Abbara, S., Arai, A., Asch, F. M., Badano, L. P., Bolen, M. A., Connolly, H. M., Cuéllar-Calàbria, H., Czerny, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.015 · Cited by 641
Flacke, S., Fischer, S., Scott, M. J., Fuhrhop, R. J., Allen, J. S., McLean, M., Winter, P., Sicard, G. A., Gaffney, P. J., Wickline, S. A., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc3601.094303 · Cited by 515
Corti, R., Fayad, Z. A., Fuster, V., Worthley, S. G., Helft, G., Chesebro, J., Mercuri, M., & Badimon, J. J. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.104.3.249 · Cited by 478
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fayad, Z. A., Fuster, V., Fallon, J. T., Jayasundera, T., Worthley, S. G., Helft, G., Aguinaldo, J. G., Badimon, J. J., & Sharma, S. K.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-510
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2041962552
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive In Vivo Human Coronary Artery Lumen and Wall Imaging Using Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.5.506
- The paper
- Fayad, Z. A., Fuster, V., Fallon, J. T., Jayasundera, T., Worthley, S. G., Helft, G., Aguinaldo, J. G., Badimon, J. J., & Sharma, S. K. (2000). Noninvasive In Vivo Human Coronary Artery Lumen and Wall Imaging Using Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.5.506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.