Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Development After the Fontan Operation

Open access
Wernovsky, Gil, Stiles, Karen M., Gauvreau, Kimberlee, Gentles, Thomas L., duPlessis, Adre J., Bellinger, David C., Walsh, Amy Z., Burnett, Janice, Jonas, Richard A., Mayer, John E., Newburger, Jane W.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Patients with a single ventricle have multiple risk factors for central nervous system injury, both before and after the Fontan procedure. Methods and Results —A geographically selected cohort was invited to undergo standardized testing, including age-appropriate measures of intelligence quotient (IQ) and achievement tests. Historical information was obtained by chart review and patient questionnaires. Of the 222 eligible patients, 133 (59.9%) participated. Median age at testing was 11.1 years (range, 3.7 to 41.0 years), 6.0 years (range, 1.6 to 19.6 years) after surgery. Mean full-scale IQ was 95.7±17.4 ( P <0.006 versus normal); 10 patients (7.8%) had full-scale IQ scores <70 ( P =0.001). After adjustment for socioeconomic status, lower IQ was associated with the use of circulatory arrest before the Fontan operation ( P =0.002), the anatomic diagnoses of hypoplastic left heart syndrome ( P <0.001) and “other complex” ( P =0.05), and prior placement of a pulmonary artery band ( P =0.04). Mean composite achievement score was 91.6±15.4 ( P <0.001 versus normal); 14 patients (10.8%) scored <70 ( P <0.001). After adjustment for socioeconomic status, independent risk factors for low achievement scores included the diagnoses of hypoplastic left heart syndrome ( P =0.004) and “other complex” ( P =0.003) or prior use of circulatory arrest ( P =0.03), as well as a reoperation with cardiopulmonary bypass within 30 days of the Fontan ( P =0.01). Conclusions —Most individual patients palliated with the Fontan procedure in the 1970s and 1980s have cognitive outcome and academic function within the normal range, but the performance of the cohort is lower than that of the general population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.8.883

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Wernovsky, G., Stiles, K. M., Gauvreau, K., Gentles, T. L., duPlessis, A. J., Bellinger, D. C., Walsh, A. Z., Burnett, J., Jonas, R. A., Mayer, J. E., & Newburger, J. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-08-22
Volume
102
Issue
8
Pages
883-889
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1990365472
Cited by
273
References
3
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Development After the Fontan Operation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.8.883
The paper
Wernovsky, G., Stiles, K. M., Gauvreau, K., Gentles, T. L., duPlessis, A. J., Bellinger, D. C., Walsh, A. Z., Burnett, J., Jonas, R. A., Mayer, J. E., & Newburger, J. W. (2000). Cognitive Development After the Fontan Operation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.8.883

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.