Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery

Open access
Christen, Thomas, Verin, Vitali, Bochaton-Piallat, Marie-Luce, Popowski, Youri, Ramaekers, Frans, Debruyne, Philippe, Camenzind, Edoardo, van Eys, Guillaume, Gabbiani, Giulio·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background —To characterize the cells responsible for neointima formation after porcine coronary artery wall injury, we studied the expression of smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation markers in 2 models: (1) self-expanding stent implantation resulting in no or little interruption of internal elastic lamina and (2) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) resulting in complete medial rupture and exposure of adventitia to blood components. Methods and Results —The expression of α-smooth muscle (SM) actin, SM myosin heavy chain isoforms 1 and 2, desmin, and smoothelin was investigated by means of immunohistochemistry and Western blots in tissues of the arterial wall collected at different time points and in cell populations cultured from these tissues. The expression of smoothelin, a marker of late SMC differentiation, was used to discriminate between SMCs and myofibroblasts. Both stent- and PTCA-induced neointimal tissues and their cultured cell populations expressed all 4 markers. The adventitial tissue underlying PTCA-induced lesions temporarily expressed α-SM actin, desmin, and SM myosin heavy chain isoforms, but not smoothelin. When placed in culture, adventitial cells expressed only α-SM actin. Conclusions —Our results suggest that SMCs are the main components of coronary artery neointima after both self-expanding stent implantation and PTCA. The adventitial reaction observed after PTCA evolves with a chronology independent of that of neointima formation and probably corresponds to a myofibroblastic reaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.103.6.882

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Christen, T., Verin, V., Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L., Popowski, Y., Ramaekers, F., Debruyne, P., Camenzind, E., van Eys, G., & Gabbiani, G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-02-13
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
882-888
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2102374129
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.103.6.882
The paper
Christen, T., Verin, V., Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L., Popowski, Y., Ramaekers, F., Debruyne, P., Camenzind, E., van Eys, G., & Gabbiani, G. (2001). Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.6.882

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.