The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Recognition of Strictly Posterior Myocardial Infarction by Conventional Scalar Electrocardiography
Abstract
This study was undertaken in order to determine whether the standard scalar electrocardiogram contains sufficient information to permit the recognition of strictly posterior myocardial infarction. Sixteen patients were selected on the basis of vectorcardiographic evidence and four on the basis of autopsy evidence. One hundred normal adult electrocardiograms served as controls. The data indicate that strictly posterior infarction causes (1) R waves of 0.04 second in V 1 and in contiguous right anterior chest leads with upright T waves and, in the acute phase, ST-segment depressions, (2) Q waves of 0.04 second in an area posteriorly between the spine and the left scapula, (3) R/S ratios equal to or greater than one in V 1 and V 2 , (4) slurring of the descending limb of the R wave in lead V 1 due to abrupt change in QRS direction, and (5) no pathologic Q waves in the standard 12 leads unless diaphragmatic or lateral infarction coexists. Extra chest leads derived from the right anterior and left posterior thorax serve principally to corroborate the diagnoses. R waves of 0.04 second or R/S ratios equal to or greater than one in lead V 1 were also found in the normal child, complete right bundle-branch block, the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with an anteriorly directed delta wave, right ventricular hypertrophy, and an occasional normal adult especially with vertical frontal plane electrical axis. Attention to these differential diagnoses and to the foregoing manifestations of strictly posterior infarction facilitate its recognition by conventional scalar electrocardiography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram
Rautaharju, P. M., Surawicz, B., & Gettes, L. S. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.014 · Cited by 1,016
Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size
Roark, S. F., Ideker, R. E., Wagner, G. S., Alonso, D. R., Bishop, S. P., Bloor, C. M., Bramlet, D. A., Edwards, J. E., Fallon, J. T., Gottlieb, G. J., et al. (1983) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80069-1 · Cited by 347
de Luna, A. B., Cino, J., Goldwasser, D., Kotzeva, A., Elosua, R., Carreras, F., Pujadas, S., Garcia-Moll, X., Santaló, M., Fiol, M., et al. (2008) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.10.002 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- PERLOFF, J. K.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1964-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 706-718
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2048174328
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Recognition of Strictly Posterior Myocardial Infarction by Conventional Scalar Electrocardiography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.30.5.706
- The paper
- PERLOFF, J. K. (1964). The Recognition of Strictly Posterior Myocardial Infarction by Conventional Scalar Electrocardiography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.30.5.706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.