Cited by 459Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiac Health and Mental Health

Predictive implications of stress testing. Follow-up of 2700 subjects after maximum treadmill stress testing.

Open access
Ellestad, M H, Wan, M K·1975·Circulation

Abstract

Follow-up data on 2700 subjects who had had maximum stress tests were assembled in life tables. A positive test, characterized by ST-segment depression of 1.5 mm, 0.08 sec from the J point, predicted an incidence of some new coronary event of 9.5% a year, as compared with 1.7% in those with a negative test. The incidence of infarction and death was also significantly higher than in the negative responders. Early onset of ischemia occurring at moderate exercise (4 metabolic equivalents-METS) resulted in an incidence of all coronary events of 15% a year, while ischemia first manifested at the seventh minute of exercise (approximately 8 METS) results in an incidence of only 4% per year. The magnitude of ST depression and the age of onset of ischemia failed to influence the incidence of coronary events. A myocardial infarction previous to the test increased the incidence of events in both positive and negative responders. The positives with a previous infarction had more than double the incidence of coronary events than the positive responders with no pre-existing infarction. Those with chronotropic incompetence had a high incidence of coronary events even though the ECG response to exercise was normal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.51.2.363

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellestad, M. H., & Wan, M. K.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1975-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
363-369
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2136850520
Cited by
459
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
exercise stress testing, treadmill exercise testing, ST-segment depression, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, mortality, life tables, exercise-induced ischemia, chronotropic incompetence, old myocardial infarction
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Angina Pectoris, California, Computers, Coronary Disease, Electrocardiography, Epidemiologic Methods, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Sex Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review