Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Technetium stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams in patients with chest pain of varying etiology.

Willerson, J T, Parkey, R W, Bonte, F J, Meyer, S L, Atkins, J M, Stokley, E M·1975·Circulation

Abstract

Technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate was utilized for myocardial imaging in 202 patients admitted to the hospital with chest pain of uncertain etiology. One hundred and one patients had clinical and evolved electrocardiographic and enzymatic evidence of acute myocardial infarction. Ninety-six of these 101 patients had increased myocardial uptake of the technetium stannous pyrophosphate and positive myocardial scintigrams; there was nearly precise correlation between the ECG and myocardial imaging localization of the area of infarction for acute transmural myocardial infarctions. In the five patients with negative myocardial images the scintigrams were obtained after seven or more days had elapsed following the myocardial infarction. In the remaining 101 patients no clinical, ECG, or enzymatic evidence of infarction developed; 92 of these patients had negative myocardial scintigrams. Seven of the remaining nine patients were admitted with "unstable angina pectoris", and despite the absence of diagnostic ECG and enzyme evolution each of these patients had faintly and diffusely positive myocardial scintigrams. The remaining two patients had positive myocardial scintigrams but no definite ECG or enzymatic evidence of acute myocardial infarction. Thus the technetium pyrophosphate imaging technique appears safe, inexpensive and to correlate well with ECG and enzyme identification of the presence of infarction and with ECG localization of myocardial infarction. In addition the positive myocardial scintigrams in some patients with "unstable angina" suggest that there may be limited myocardial necrosis that is ordinarily undetected by ECG and enzymes in these patients. The incidence of false positive and false negative scintigrams appears to be small.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.51.6.1046

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Willerson, J. T., Parkey, R. W., Bonte, F. J., Meyer, S. L., Atkins, J. M., & Stokley, E. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1975-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1046-1052
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2035710135
Cited by
209
References
0
FWCI
37.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technetium stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams in patients with chest pain of varying etiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.51.6.1046
The paper
Willerson, J. T., Parkey, R. W., Bonte, F. J., Meyer, S. L., Atkins, J. M., & Stokley, E. M. (1975). Technetium stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams in patients with chest pain of varying etiology. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.51.6.1046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.