The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation of postmortem anatomic findings with electrocardiographic changes in patients with myocardial infarction: retrospective study of patients with typical anterior and posterior infarcts.
Open accessAbstract
This retrospective study correlates electrocardiographic and histopathologic findings in 24 patients with single well-circumscribed infarcts to determine 1) whether ECG terms commonly used to describe the location of myocardial infarcts are significant, and 2) whether the extent of infarct can be determined using QRS characteristics. Transverse sections of the hearts were photographed. Based on histologic sections, the infarct was outlined on the photograph and each section was planimetered via a sonic digitizer into a computer that was programmed to divide the left ventricle into 8 radial sectors and also into basal, mesial, and apical thirds. The percentage of infarct in each of these areas was then calculated. Of the 24 hearts evaluated 12 had posterior infarcts and 12 had anterior infarcts. Posterior infarcts principally involved the basal and mesial levels, whereas the anterior infarcts were more extensive in the apical and mesial thirds, with relative or total sparing of the base. Posterior infarcts were associated with Q waves in leads II, III and aVF in 11 instances. The other posterior infarct was associated with markedly diminished R waves in leads II, III and aVf in the presence of a horizontal axis. All anterior infarcts were associated with Q waves or markedly diminished R waves in the right precordial leads. Eight of the anterior infarcts exhibited circumferential apical involvement and all eight were associated with Q waves or markedly diminished R waves in the left precordial leads. This study documents the electrocardiographic identification of anterior, posterior, and apical infarcts by correlation with pathologic anatomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., Jaffe, A. S., Simoons, M. L., Chaitman, B. R., & White, H. D. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31826e1058 · Cited by 2,985
Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., Jaffe, A. S., Simoons, M. L., Chaitman, B. R., White, H. D., & For the Universal Definition of MI, W. G. J. E. (2012) · Global Heart · doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2012.08.001 · Cited by 544
Cerebral white matter lesions and atherosclerosis in the Rotterdam Study
Bots, M. L., Breteler, M. M. B., Hofman, A., Grobbee, D. E., van Swieten, J. C., van Gijn, J., van Swieten, J. C., & de Jong, P. T. V. M. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)91144-b · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Savage, R. M., Wagner, G. S., Ideker, R. E., Podolsky, S. A., & Hackel, D. B.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-285
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1989399923
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of postmortem anatomic findings with electrocardiographic changes in patients with myocardial infarction: retrospective study of patients with typical anterior and posterior infarcts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.55.2.279
- The paper
- Savage, R. M., Wagner, G. S., Ideker, R. E., Podolsky, S. A., & Hackel, D. B. (1977). Correlation of postmortem anatomic findings with electrocardiographic changes in patients with myocardial infarction: retrospective study of patients with typical anterior and posterior infarcts. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.55.2.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.