Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perspectives on systolic hypertension. The Framingham study.

Open access
Kannel, W B, Dawber, T R, McGee, D L·1980·Circulation

Abstract

Diastolic hypertension has been widely and justifiably accepted as a cause of cardiovascular mortality. However, it has also been accepted that the cardiovascular sequelae of hypertension derive chiefly from the diastolic component. Because systolic and diastolic pressure are usually highly correlated it is not easy to dissociate the effects of each. Statistical analysis suggests that systolic pressure is actually the more potent contributor to cardiovascular sequelae. Even isolated systolic pressure elevation is associated witn an excess cardiovascular mortality. At low diastolic pressures (i.e., less than 95 mm Hg), risk rises with the level of systolic pressure. Also, isolated systolic hypertension is most ominous in the elderly, in whom it is highly prevalent. Isolated systolic hypertension was related to the occurrence of "direct" complications as well as to atherosclerotic sequelae. It was also associated with excess mortality, taking into account rigid vessels as judged from pulse-wave recordings. Trials to determine whether the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension is efficacious for avoiding its demonstrated excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are urgently needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.61.6.1179

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Kannel, W. B., Dawber, T. R., & McGee, D. L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1980-06
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
1179-1182
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2020150109
Cited by
456
References
1
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.