Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS).

Chaitman, B R, Bourassa, M G, Davis, K, Rogers, W J, Tyras, D H, Berger, R, Kennedy, J W, Fisher, L, Judkins, M P, Mock, M B, Killip, T·1981·Circulation

Abstract

The prevalence of coronary artery stenoses greater than or equal to 70% or left main stenosis greater than or equal to 50% was evaluated in 20,391 patients who underwent angiography in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study from 1975-1979. After the patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction were excluded, the disease prevalence in the 8157 patients with definite angina, probable angina, and nonspecific chest pain was 93%, 66% and 14% in men and 72%, 36% and 6% in women (p less than 0.001). The age and sex of the patients and character of chest pain were important determinants of disease prevalence and severity. Left main or three-vessel coronary disease occurred in more than 50% of middle-aged men and older women with definite angina and in more than 50% of men who had probable angina and were older than 60 years of age. In contrast, left main coronary disease occurred in less than 2% of 1282 men and less than 1% of 1397 women with nonspecific chest pain regardless of age. In this latter patient subset, less than 5% of men and less than 1% of women in each decade under 60 years had left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease. Thus, high-risk coronary disease is common in middle-aged patients with definite angina and older patients with probable angina, but is rare in patients with nonspecific chest pain. Indications and guidelines for diagnostic noninvasive tests and coronary angiography could be based on these results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.64.2.360

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Chaitman, B. R., Bourassa, M. G., Davis, K., Rogers, W. J., Tyras, D. H., Berger, R., Kennedy, J. W., Fisher, L., Judkins, M. P., Mock, M. B., & Killip, T.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1981-08
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
360-367
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2012192382
Cited by
488
References
1
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.64.2.360
The paper
Chaitman, B. R., Bourassa, M. G., Davis, K., Rogers, W. J., Tyras, D. H., Berger, R., Kennedy, J. W., Fisher, L., Judkins, M. P., Mock, M. B., & Killip, T. (1981). Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.64.2.360

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.