The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Significance of the angiographic morphology of localized coronary stenoses: histopathologic correlations.
Open accessAbstract
Postmortem coronary angiographic morphology was correlated with histologic sections of 73 localized subtotal coronary artery stenoses (50-99% reduction of luminal diameter) to determine whether complicated or uncomplicated atherosclerotic lesions could be detected angiographically. Lesions were divided into two types, according to angiographic morphology: Type I stenoses had smooth borders, an hourglass configurations, and no intraluminal lucencies; type II stenoses had irregular borders or intraluminal lucencies. Histologic sections were also divided into two types: "uncomplicated" stenoses had fatty or fibrous plaques with intact intimal surfaces and no superimposed thrombus; "complicated" stenoses manifested plaque rupture, plaque hemorrhage, superimposed partially occluding thrombus, or recanalized thrombus. Among 35 lesions with type I angiographic morphology, four (11.4%) were complicated lesions histologically. Among the 38 stenoses showing type II angiographic morphology, 30 (78.9%) were complicated lesions. Postmortem angiography thus had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 79% for detecting complicated stenoses on the basis of irregular borders or intraluminal lucencies. Pathologic studies have shown that acute occlusive thrombosis of a coronary artery is usually associated with complicated atherosclerotic stenoses. Thus, complicated lesions represent a greater risk factor for acute myocardial infarction or sudden death than do uncomplicated lesions. This study suggests that coronary stenoses characterized angiographically by irregular borders or intraluminal lucencies are probably the clinically more dangerous "complicated" type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Pathogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease and the Acute Coronary Syndromes
Epstein, F. H., Fuster, V., Badimon, L., Badimon, J. J., & Chesebro, J. H. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199201233260406 · Cited by 2,717
Davies, M. J., & Thomas, A. C. (1985) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.53.4.363 · Cited by 1,985
RICHARDSON, P. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90953-7 · Cited by 1,258
Davies, M. J., Richardson, P. D., Woolf, N., Katz, D. R., & Mann, J. (1993) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.69.5.377 · Cited by 1,127
Stary, H. C., Chandler, A. B., Dinsmore, R. E., Fuster, V., Glagov, S., Insull, W., Rosenfeld, M. E., Schwartz, C. J., Wagner, W. D., & Wissler, R. W. (1995) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.15.9.1512 · Cited by 965
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, D. C., & Fallon, J. T.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-320
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1993724662
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of the angiographic morphology of localized coronary stenoses: histopathologic correlations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.66.2.316
- The paper
- Levin, D. C., & Fallon, J. T. (1982). Significance of the angiographic morphology of localized coronary stenoses: histopathologic correlations. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.66.2.316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.