The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation.
Abstract
A noninvasive technique for assessing cardiac output (CO) was evaluated by comparing it with thermodilution determinations in patients in the intensive care unit. The new method uses pulsed ultrasound to measure aortic diameter and continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound to obtain aortic blood velocity. An initial study evaluating just the velocity measurement showed that changes of the Doppler index of output (DI) correlated well with those of thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO). Linear regression analysis yielded delta DI = 0.87 delta TDCO + 0.14 (r = 0.83, n = 95). Using a university research instrument these measurements were possible in 54 of 60 patients (90%). A second study using a prototype commercial device incorporated the diameter measurement. Ultrasonic cardiac output (UCO), calculated as the time integral of velocity multiplied by the aortic area, was compared to TDCO. The data, obtained from 45 of 53 patients (85%), are described by the linear regression UCO = 0.95TDCO + 0.38 (r = 0.94, n = 110) over a range of 2-11 l/min. Patients with aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency or a prosthetic valve have been excluded from the second study due to conditions likely to violate the assumptions upon which the calculation of absolute cardiac output is based. These results indicate that accurate CO can be measured by noninvasive ultrasound in most patients. The technique may be useful for extended CO monitoring in acute care patients and for CO assessment in many other types of patients undergoing diagnostic studies and therapeutic interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Naughton, M. T., Rahman, M. A., Hara, K., Floras, J. S., & Bradley, T. D. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.91.6.1725 · Cited by 466
Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Généreux, P., Head, S. J., Hahn, R., Daneault, B., Kodali, S., Williams, M. R., van Mieghem, N. M., Alu, M. C., Serruys, P. W., Kappetein, A. P., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1039 · Cited by 447
Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography.
Ihlen, H., Amlie, J. P., Dale, J., Forfang, K., Nitter-Hauge, S., Otterstad, J. E., Simonsen, S., & Myhre, E. (1984) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.51.1.54 · Cited by 337
Doppler Echocardiography: Theory, Instrumentation, Technique, and Application
NISHIMURA, R. A., MILLER, F. A., CALLAHAN, M. J., BENASSI, R. C., SEWARD, J. B., & TAJIK, A. J. (1985) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60540-0 · Cited by 263
Hemodynamic Effects of Simulated Obstructive Apneas in Humans With and Without Heart Failure
Bradley, T. D., Hall, M. J., Ando, S.-I., & Floras, J. S. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.6.1827 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Huntsman, L. L., Stewart, D. K., Barnes, S. R., Franklin, S. B., Colocousis, J. S., & Hessel, E. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 593-602
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2112789217
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.67.3.593
- The paper
- Huntsman, L. L., Stewart, D. K., Barnes, S. R., Franklin, S. B., Colocousis, J. S., & Hessel, E. A. (1983). Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.67.3.593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.