The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nifedipine therapy for patients with threatened and acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison.
Abstract
Preliminary clinical and laboratory observations suggest that nifedipine might prevent progression of threatened myocardial infarction by reversing coronary spasm or might limit necrosis during the course of acute myocardial infarction. We screened 3143 patients with ischemic pain of greater than 45 min duration and randomly assigned 105 eligible patients with threatened myocardial infarction and 66 with acute myocardial infarction to receive nifedipine (20 mg orally every 4 hr for 14 days) or placebo plus standard care. Treatment was started 4.6 +/- 0.1 hr after the onset of pain. Infarct size index was calculated by the MB-creatine kinase (CK) method and expressed as CK-geq/m2 +/- SE. The incidence of progression to infarction among patients with threatened myocardial infarction was not significantly altered by nifedipine (36 of 48 [75%] for placebo-treated and 43 of 57 [75%] for nifedipine-treated patients). Furthermore, infarct size index was similar among placebo- and nifedipine-treated patients (16.9 +/- 1.5 MB-CK-geq/m2, n = 65, and 17.0 +/- 1.5 MB-CK-geq/m2, n = 68, respectively) with threatened myocardial infarction who exhibited infarction and for those with acute myocardial infarction. Among the 171 eligible patients randomly assigned to drug or placebo, 6 month mortality did not differ significantly (8.5% for placebo vs 10.1% for nifedipine, NS), but mortality in the 2 weeks after randomization was significantly higher for nifedipine-treated patients (0% for placebo compared with 7.9% for nifedipine, p = .018).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heart rate variability: A review
Rajendra Acharya, U., Paul Joseph, K., Kannathal, N., Lim, C. M., & Suri, J. S. (2006) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-006-0119-0 · Cited by 2,820
The Framingham Offspring Study
Allhoff, P., Laaser, U., & Heinrich, J. (1991) · Kompendium der Lipid-Studien · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-95642-3_25 · Cited by 831
Califf, R. M., Adams, K. F., McKenna, W. J., Gheorghiade, M., Uretsky, B. F., McNulty, S. E., Darius, H., Schulman, K., Zannad, F., Handberg-Thurmond, E., et al. (1997) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70105-4 · Cited by 665
Diltiazem and Reinfarction in Patients with Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction
Gibson, R. S., Boden, W. E., Theroux, P., Strauss, H. D., Pratt, C. M., Gheorghiade, M., Capone, R. J., Crawford, M. H., Schlant, R. C., Kleiger, R. E., et al. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198608143150704 · Cited by 537
Self-citationThe effect of diltiazem on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction
Warnock, E. (1989) · The Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/0736-4679(89)90390-9 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Muller, J. E., Morrison, J., Stone, P. H., Rude, R. E., Rosner, B., Roberts, R., Pearle, D. L., Turi, Z. G., Schneider, J. F., & Serfas, D. H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 740-747
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2031232834
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nifedipine therapy for patients with threatened and acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.69.4.740
- The paper
- Muller, J. E., Morrison, J., Stone, P. H., Rude, R. E., Rosner, B., Roberts, R., Pearle, D. L., Turi, Z. G., Schneider, J. F., & Serfas, D. H. (1984). Nifedipine therapy for patients with threatened and acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.69.4.740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.