The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window.
Abstract
Two methods of measuring stroke volume and cardiac output with pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography were developed and validated against the thermodilution technique in 39 patients, 33 of which were in an intensive care unit. With the use of the apical four-chamber view, a mitral inflow method combined the velocity of left ventricular inflow at the mitral anulus with the cross-sectional area of the anulus calculated from its diameter at middiastole (area = pi r2). From the apical five-chamber view a left ventricular outflow method combined the velocity of left ventricular outflow with the cross-sectional area of the aortic anulus calculated from its diameter during early systole (parasternal long-axis view). Measurements with the mitral inflow and left ventricular outflow methods were obtained in 35 of 39 (90%) and 39 of 39 (100%) patients, respectively. Validation of the mitral method excluded patients with mitral regurgitation (n = 11) and validation of the left ventricular outflow method excluded those with aortic regurgitation (n = 4). Good correlations were observed between thermodilution and Doppler measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output for both the mitral anulus method (R = .96 and .87, respectively) and the left ventricular outflow method (R = .95 and .91, respectively). The results of the two methods correlated well with each other in patients without regurgitant valve lesions. A greater interobserver variability was observed with the mitral anulus method, which was related solely to greater variability in measuring the annular diameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pulmonary Hypertension as a Risk Factor for Death in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Gladwin, M. T., Sachdev, V., Jison, M. L., Shizukuda, Y., Plehn, J. F., Minter, K., Brown, B., Coles, W. A., Nichols, J. S., Ernst, I., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa035477 · Cited by 1,325
Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Généreux, P., Head, S. J., Hahn, R., Daneault, B., Kodali, S., Williams, M. R., van Mieghem, N. M., Alu, M. C., Serruys, P. W., Kappetein, A. P., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1039 · Cited by 447
Zoghbi, W. (2003) · European Journal of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.euje.2003.07.001 · Cited by 396
JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020 Guidelines on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease
Izumi, C., Eishi, K., Ashihara, K., Arita, T., Otsuji, Y., Kunihara, T., Komiya, T., Shibata, T., Seo, Y., Daimon, M., et al. (2020) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.cj-20-0135 · Cited by 367
Dinenno, F. A., Jones, P. P., Seals, D. R., & Tanaka, H. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.2.164 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, J. F., Kuo, L. C., Nelson, J. G., Limacher, M. C., & Quinones, M. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-431
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2066790934
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.70.3.425
- The paper
- Lewis, J. F., Kuo, L. C., Nelson, J. G., Limacher, M. C., & Quinones, M. A. (1984). Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.70.3.425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.