The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy and safety of timolol for prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Open accessAbstract
Forty-one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic timolol or placebo, given in a double-blind fashion. beta-Adrenoceptor-blocking therapy was stopped at least one half-life before surgery. Three to 7 hr after surgery (304 +/- 56 min), 0.5 mg of timolol or placebo was given intravenously twice daily in a double-blind manner. When oral medications were resumed postoperatively, 10 mg of timolol twice daily or placebo was continued orally. Continuous electrocardiograms were recorded for 24 hr before and for 7 days after surgery with a standard cassette recorder. No patient received digoxin. Both groups were comparable for frequency of preoperative supraventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp time, number of bypass grafts, and total duration of monitoring. Analysis of arrhythmias was done by hand counts, and supraventricular arrhythmias were divided into supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Timolol decreased the frequency of supraventricular tachycardia (581 episodes placebo vs 84 timolol; p less than .05) and of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (291 episodes placebo vs five timolol; p less than .05). Timolol decreased the number of patients with severe (heart rate greater than 200 beats/min, duration greater than 50 beats) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia (four placebo vs 0 timolol; p less than .05) and also decreased the number of episodes of severe (heart rate greater than 200 beats/min, duration greater than 5 min) atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (16 placebo vs one timolol; p less than .005). There were differences in the durations of supraventricular arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal
Schotten, U., Verheule, S., Kirchhof, P., & Goette, A. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2009 · Cited by 1,273
Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias
Creswell, L. L., Schuessler, R. B., Rosenbloom, M., & Cox, J. L. (1993) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0003-4975(93)90894-n · Cited by 984
Postoperative atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, manifestations and management
Dobrev, D., Aguilar, M., Heijman, J., Guichard, J.-B., & Nattel, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-019-0166-5 · Cited by 608
Crystal, E., Connolly, S. J., Sleik, K., Ginger, T. J., & Yusuf, S. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000021113.44111.3e · Cited by 490
Post-operative atrial fibrillation: a maze of mechanisms
Maesen, B., Nijs, J., Maessen, J., Allessie, M., & Schotten, U. (2012) · Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eur208 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- White, H. D., Antman, E. M., Glynn, M. A., Collins, J. J., Cohn, L. H., Shemin, R. J., & Friedman, P. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 479-484
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2107685949
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of timolol for prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.70.3.479
- The paper
- White, H. D., Antman, E. M., Glynn, M. A., Collins, J. J., Cohn, L. H., Shemin, R. J., & Friedman, P. L. (1984). Efficacy and safety of timolol for prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.70.3.479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.