Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 530

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of parameters of left ventricular diastolic filling with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with cineangiography.

Rokey, R, Kuo, L C, Zoghbi, W A, Limacher, M C, Quinones, M A·1985·Circulation

Abstract

To determine the relationship between Doppler-derived flow velocity through the mitral anulus and angiographic parameters of left ventricular filling, 30 patients were studied by two-dimensional echocardiography combined with pulsed Doppler echocardiography followed within 1 hr by left ventricular angiography. The average heart rate for each test was 69 beats/min. Doppler-derived parameters included: early peak diastolic velocity (E) and peak atrial velocity, peak filling rate computed as E X cross-sectional area of the mitral anulus derived from the annular diameter, normalized peak filling rate computed as peak filling rate divided by the left ventricular end-diastolic volume determined by two-dimensional echocardiography, and half filling fraction derived from the time-velocity integral of the Doppler-determined velocity curve. Frame-by-frame left ventricular volumes were obtained throughout diastole from single-plane cineangiograms. A volume-time curve with its derivative was generated by computer processing from which peak filling rate, normalized peak filling rate, and half filling fraction were measured. Morphologically, the Doppler-derived velocity profile resembled the derivative of the angiographic volume curve. In patients with reduced angiographic peak filling rates, early peak diastolic velocity was often decreased less than 45 cm/sec with a relative increase in peak atrial velocity resulting in an early peak diastolic velocity to peak atrial velocity ratio less than 1.0. There were no significant differences in mean values for peak filling rate, normalized peak filling rate, and half filling fraction by Doppler echocardiography vs angiography (296 vs 283 ml/sec, 1.9 vs 2.0 sec-1 and 0.55 vs 0.55, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.71.3.543

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 530

Metadata

Authors
Rokey, R., Kuo, L. C., Zoghbi, W. A., Limacher, M. C., & Quinones, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1985-03
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
543-550
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2043198812
Cited by
530
References
0
FWCI
28.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of parameters of left ventricular diastolic filling with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with cineangiography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.71.3.543
The paper
Rokey, R., Kuo, L. C., Zoghbi, W. A., Limacher, M. C., & Quinones, M. A. (1985). Determination of parameters of left ventricular diastolic filling with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with cineangiography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.71.3.543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.