The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiac Doppler flow velocities in human fetuses.
Abstract
Cardiac Doppler flow velocity studies were performed in normal human fetuses between 18 and 40 weeks of gestation. Two-dimensional linear array and sector scanning techniques were used for the initial evaluation of the fetuses, which included a standard ultrasound examination to determine normal anatomy and estimated gestational age and weight. Fetal cardiac ultrasound examination was then performed, with four-chamber, short-axis/great vessel, long-axis/left ventricular outflow tract, and aortic arch views obtained. Pulsed echo Doppler instrumentation was used to obtain flow velocity measurements through the tricuspid, pulmonary outflow, mitral, and aortic outflow regions. Calculation of transvalve volume flow for mitral and tricuspid valves was performed by combining the valve anulus sizes and calculated mean temporal velocities for the valves. Maximal flow velocities were greater through the tricuspid (mean maximal velocity 51 +/- 1.2 [SE] cm/sec) than through the mitral (47 +/- 1.1 cm/sec; p less than .05) valve regions, with a wide range of scatter for results between fetuses but less than 6% average variation in the individual fetuses during gestation. For 18 fetuses, right heart dimensions and volume flows (mean 307 + 30 ml/kg/min) were greater than left heart dimensions and volume flows (232 +/- 25 ml/kg/min). Doppler echocardiography may prove to be useful as an adjunct to imaging echocardiography for evaluation of fetal cardiac anatomy and function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Donofrio, M. T., Moon-Grady, A. J., Hornberger, L. K., Copel, J. A., Sklansky, M. S., Abuhamad, A., Cuneo, B. F., Huhta, J. C., Jonas, R. A., Krishnan, A., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d · Cited by 1,275
Schneider, D. J., & Moore, J. W. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.592063 · Cited by 709
“forthee....towhom% nosoundisdissonantwhichtellsoflife”% —coleridge
McNay, M., & Fleming, J. E. (1999) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00129-x · Cited by 425
Rasanen, J., Wood, D. C., Weiner, S., Ludomirski, A., & Huhta, J. C. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.5.1068 · Cited by 347
Stümpflen, I., Stümpflen, A., Wimmer, M., & Bernaschek, G. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)04069-x · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, K. L., Meijboom, E. J., Sahn, D. J., Scagnelli, S. A., Valdes-Cruz, L. M., & Shenker, L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-46
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2041356184
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac Doppler flow velocities in human fetuses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.73.1.41
- The paper
- Reed, K. L., Meijboom, E. J., Sahn, D. J., Scagnelli, S. A., Valdes-Cruz, L. M., & Shenker, L. (1986). Cardiac Doppler flow velocities in human fetuses. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.1.41
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.