The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease.
Open accessAbstract
To determine risk factors for restenosis, we studied 998 patients who underwent elective coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to native coronary arteries between July 1980 and July 1984. Restenosis, defined as a luminal narrowing of greater than 50% at follow-up, was present in 302 patients (30.2%). Univariate analysis of 29 factors revealed seven factors related to restenosis: vessel dilated (circumflex coronary artery 18%, right coronary artery 27%, left anterior descending artery 34%; p less than .01), final gradient of 15 mm Hg or less compared with greater than 15 mm Hg (27% vs 38%, p less than .01), duration of angina greater than 2 months compared with angina of shorter duration (27% vs 35%, p = .01), post-PTCA stenosis of 30% or less compared with 31% to 50% (28% vs 36%, p less than .025), stable vs unstable angina (26% vs 34%, p less than .05), presence vs absence of intimal dissection (26% vs 32%, p = .07), and female gender vs male gender (25% vs 32%, p = .08). Multivariate analysis revealed five factors independently related to increased risk of restenosis in the following order of importance: PTCA in the left anterior descending artery, absence of intimal dissection immediately after PTCA, final gradient greater than 15 mm Hg, a large residual stenosis after PTCA, and unstable angina. Restenosis after PTCA is a multifactorial problem. The hemodynamic and angiographic result at the time of PTCA significantly influences long-term outcome, but additional measures aimed at reducing the rate of recurrence of atherosclerotic plaque are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
Landau, C., Lange, R. A., & Hillis, L. D. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404073301407 · Cited by 445
Yokoi, H., Daida, H., Kuwabara, Y., Nishikawa, H., Takatsu, F., Tomihara, H., Nakata, Y., Kutsumi, Y., Ohshima, S., Nishiyama, S., et al. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00270-2 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Leimgruber, P. P., Roubin, G. S., Hollman, J., Cotsonis, G. A., Meier, B., Douglas, J. S., King, S. B., & Gruentzig, A. R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1986-04
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 710-717
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2092972260
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.73.4.710
- The paper
- Leimgruber, P. P., Roubin, G. S., Hollman, J., Cotsonis, G. A., Meier, B., Douglas, J. S., King, S. B., & Gruentzig, A. R. (1986). Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.4.710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.