Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability.

Smith, J M, Clancy, E A, Valeri, C R, Ruskin, J N, Cohen, R J·1988·Circulation

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between electrical alternans and cardiac electrical stability in a series of 20 dog experiments and in a pilot clinical study. Electrical alternans was detected in both the QRS complex and the ST-T wave by use of a novel multidimensional spectral technique. The magnitude of the alteration was expressed as the alternating electrocardiographic morphology index (AEMI), expressed as parts per million of waveform energy. Electrical stability in the dog preparations was assessed via the ventricular fibrillation threshold measurement, and in the clinical studies via programmed stimulation. In 10 dog experiments, systemic hypothermia resulted in a 60% decrease in ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) (p less than .0001) and a significant increase in both AEMI(QRS) form 3.7 +/- 3.0 to 1448 +/- 548 (p less than .0001) and AEMI(ST-T) from 43.9 +/- 18.4 to 19,178 +/- 5579 (p less than .0001). In 10 dog experiments, transient coronary artery ligation also resulted in a 60% decrease in VFT (p less than .0001), an increase from 76.3 +/- 46.5 to 245 +/- 11 in AEMI(QRS) (p less than .05), and an increase from 842 +/- 505 to 1365 +/- 392 in AEMI(ST-T) (p less than .002). In 119 observations in 20 animal experiments, the rank correlation between VFT and AEMI(QRS) was -.30 (p less than .001), with that between VFT and AEMI(ST-T) being -.55 (p less than .0001). In a double-blind pilot clinical trial consisting of 23 studies in 19 patients, the result of electrophysiologic testing was used as an independent measure of cardiac electrical stability. Alternation in waveform morphology identified the inducible patient population with a sensitivity of 92%, a positive predictivity of 70%, and a specificity of 50% (p less than .05). We conclude that analysis of subtle beat-to-beat variability in electrocardiographic morphology may provide a noninvasive measure of cardiac electrical stability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.77.1.110

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J. M., Clancy, E. A., Valeri, C. R., Ruskin, J. N., & Cohen, R. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1988-01
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
110-121
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2013157031
Cited by
504
References
1
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.77.1.110
The paper
Smith, J. M., Clancy, E. A., Valeri, C. R., Ruskin, J. N., & Cohen, R. J. (1988). Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.77.1.110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.