The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony.
Abstract
Eighteen patients with isolated left bundle branch block (LBBB) were compared with 10 normal control subjects. Apexcardiograms, phonocardiograms, electrocardiograms, two-dimensional and dual M-mode echocardiograms, and radionuclide ventriculograms (RNV) were performed. There were no differences in the timing of right ventricular events between LBBB and normal subjects; however, striking delays in left ventricular systolic and diastolic events were apparent in the LBBB group. The delay was associated with shortening of left ventricular diastole and resultant increase in the ratio of right to left ventricular diastolic time in LBBB (1.2 +/- 0.08) compared with normal (1.0 +/- 0.06), p less than 0.0001. First heart sound (S1) amplitude, expressed as the ratio S1/S2, was decreased in LBBB compared with normal (0.67 +/- 0.2 compared with 1.34 +/- 0.25, p less than 0.01), in part due to wide separation of the valvular contributors to S1. The abnormal interventricular septal motion in LBBB corresponded to periods of asynchrony in contraction, ejection, end systole, and end diastole between right and left ventricles. Radionuclide ventriculograms revealed decreased regional ejection fraction of the septum in LBBB (40 +/- 16%) compared with 67 +/- 7% in normal subjects (p less than 0.001), while the apical and lateral regional ejection fractions were similar in the two groups. This loss of septal contribution resulted in a reduction in global ejection fraction in LBBB compared to normals (54 +/- 7% compared with 62 +/- 5%, p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cazeau, S., Leclercq, C., Lavergne, T., Walker, S., Varma, C., Linde, C., Garrigue, S., Kappenberger, L., Haywood, G. A., Santini, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103223441202 · Cited by 2,751
WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Hunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.167586 · Cited by 2,251
Deshmukh, P., Casavant, D. A., Romanyshyn, M., & Anderson, K. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.8.869 · Cited by 770
Bradley, D. J., Bradley, E. A., Baughman, K. L., Berger, R. D., Calkins, H., Goodman, S. N., Kass, D. A., & Powe, N. R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.6.730 · Cited by 710
Long-Term Effect of Right Ventricular Pacing on Myocardial Perfusion and Function
Tse, H.-F., & Lau, C.-P. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00586-4 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Grines, C. L., Bashore, T. M., Boudoulas, H., Olson, S., Shafer, P., & Wooley, C. F.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 845-853
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2145293134
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.79.4.845
- The paper
- Grines, C. L., Bashore, T. M., Boudoulas, H., Olson, S., Shafer, P., & Wooley, C. F. (1989). Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.79.4.845
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.