Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 397

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time.

Open access
Haws, C W, Lux, R L·1990·Circulation

Abstract

Classic cable theory was used to analyze the relation between the activation-recovery interval measured from unipolar electrograms and transmembrane action potential duration. Theoretic analysis demonstrated that the temporal derivative of the extracellular potential is proportional to a spatial weighting of the third temporal derivative of the transmembrane action potentials along a cable with uniform propagation in a homogeneous medium. Thus, the activation-recovery interval, measured as the interval between times of minimum derivative (Vmin) of the QRS and maximum derivative (Vmax) of the T wave, should be related to action potential duration, measured as the interval between times of Vmax of the upstroke and Vmin of the downstroke of the transmembrane action potential. This relation was examined experimentally in 12 anesthetized dogs. Unipolar electrograms and transmembrane action potentials were recorded simultaneously from sites within 2 mm of each other during control states, cardiac sympathetic nerve stimulation, localized epicardial warming, and graded reductions in myocardial perfusion. The heart was paced from several sites. There was close correlation between activation-recovery interval and action potential duration measurements taken during cardiac sympathetic nerve stimulation and local epicardial warming (r = 0.96 and 0.99 for cardiac sympathetic nerve stimulation and warming, respectively). In five animals in which coronary perfusion pressure was gradually lowered, the variables correlated closely over a range of values from 62 to 212 msec (r = 0.98). However, although the overall correlation was good and mean differences between activation-recovery interval and action potential duration were small, in individual cases there were differences up to 24 msec.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.81.1.281

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 397

Metadata

Authors
Haws, C. W., & Lux, R. L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1990-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
281-288
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2168926746
Cited by
397
References
0
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.81.1.281
The paper
Haws, C. W., & Lux, R. L. (1990). Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.81.1.281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.