The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of a newly developed troponin T enzyme immunoassay for the detection of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study comprised 388 patients admitted with chest pain and suspected myocardial infarction and 101 patients with skeletal muscle damage and additional suspected myocardial cell damage. Troponin T was elevated to more than twice the analytical sensitivity of the assay (0.5 microgram/l) in all patients with non-Q wave (range, 1.2-5 micrograms/l) and Q wave infarction (range, 3-220 micrograms/l). Troponin T appeared in serum as early as 3 hours after onset of pain in 50% of the patients and remained elevated in all patients for more than 130 hours, revealing release kinetics of both free cytosolic and structurally bound molecules. The diagnostic efficiency of troponin T was superior to that of creatine kinase-MB (98% versus 97%) and remained at 98% until 5.5 days after admission, if patients with unstable angina were excluded from analysis. In the 79 patients with unstable angina, troponin T was elevated (range, 0.55-3.1 micrograms/l) in at least one blood sample from each of 37 patients (56%). Circulating troponin T was correlated to the presence of reversible ST segment or T wave changes on the electrocardiogram (p less than 0.005) and to the frequency of in-hospital complications. In the 101 patients with skeletal muscle damage and suspected additional cardiac muscle damage, troponin T was the most useful test; its efficiency was 89% or 94% (depending on the discriminator value used) as compared with 63% for creatine kinase-MB. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the data of the study indicate that the newly developed troponin T test improves the efficiency of serodiagnostic tools for the detection of myocardial cell necrosis as compared with conventionally used cardiac enzymes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Clinically Suspected Myocarditis
Lauer, B., Niederau, C., Kühl, U., Schannwell, M., Pauschinger, M., Strauer, B.-E., & Schultheiss, H.-P. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00317-3 · Cited by 477
Heeschen, C., Hamm, C. W., Bruemmer, J., & Simoons, M. L. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00581-7 · Cited by 414
Labugger, R., Organ, L., Collier, C., Atar, D., & Van Eyk, J. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.11.1221 · Cited by 315
Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: a clinical review
Hijazi, Z., Oldgren, J., Siegbahn, A., Granger, C. B., & Wallentin, L. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht024 · Cited by 298
Neuroanatomic correlates of stroke-related myocardial injury
Ay, H., Koroshetz, W. J., Benner, T., Vangel, M. G., Melinosky, C., Arsava, E. M., Ayata, C., Zhu, M., Schwamm, L. H., & Sorensen, A. G. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000206077.13705.6d · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Katus, H. A., Remppis, A., Neumann, F. J., Scheffold, T., Diederich, K. W., Vinar, G., Noe, A., Matern, G., & Kuebler, W.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 902-912
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2075844027
- Cited by
- 814
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.83.3.902
- The paper
- Katus, H. A., Remppis, A., Neumann, F. J., Scheffold, T., Diederich, K. W., Vinar, G., Noe, A., Matern, G., & Kuebler, W. (1991). Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.83.3.902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.