Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Clinically Suspected Myocarditis

Open access
Lauer, Bernward, Niederau, Christoph, Kühl, Uwe, Schannwell, Mira, Pauschinger, Matthias, Strauer, Bodo-Eckhard, Schultheiss, Heinz-Peter·1997·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The present study investigated whether myocyte injury can be assessed sensitively by measurement of serum levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis and whether cTnT levels may predict the results of histologic and immunohistologic analysis of endomyocardial biopsy specimens. BACKGROUND Conventionally used laboratory variables often fail to show myocyte injury in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis, possibly because of a low extent of myocardial injury in these patients. Sensitive variables for myocyte injury have not yet been investigated. METHODS Eighty patients with clinically suspected myocarditis were screened for creatine kinase (CK) activity, MB isoform of CK (CK-MB) activity and cTnT. Endomyocardial biopsy specimens were examined histologically and immunohistologically. RESULTS cTnT was elevated in 28 of 80 patients with clinically suspected myocarditis, CK in 4 and CK-MB in 1. Histologic analysis alone of the endomyocardial biopsy specimen revealed evidence of myocarditis in only five patients, all with elevated cTnT levels. Twenty-three of 28 patients with elevated cTnT levels had histologically negative findings for myocarditis. Additional immunohistologic analysis revealed evidence of myocarditis in 26 (93%) of 28 patients with elevated cTnT levels and in 23 (44%) of 52 patients with normal cTnT levels. Mean cTnT levels were higher in patients with myocarditis proved histologically or immunohistologically, or both, than in patients without myocarditis (0.59 +/- 1.68 vs. 0.04 +/- 0.05, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Measurement of serum levels of cTnT provides evidence of myocyte injury in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis more sensitively than does conventional determination of cardiac enzyme levels. Myocardial cell damage may be present even in the absence of histologic signs of myocarditis. Additional immunohistologic analysis often shows lymphocytic infiltrates in these patients. Elevated levels of cTnT are highly predictive for myocarditis in this group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00317-3

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Lauer, B., Niederau, C., Kühl, U., Schannwell, M., Pauschinger, M., Strauer, B.-E., & Schultheiss, H.-P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1354-1359
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964785725
Cited by
477
References
32
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Clinically Suspected Myocarditis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00317-3
The paper
Lauer, B., Niederau, C., Kühl, U., Schannwell, M., Pauschinger, M., Strauer, B.-E., & Schultheiss, H.-P. (1997). Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Clinically Suspected Myocarditis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00317-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.