The DOI matches its Crossref record.
QT interval prolongation predicts cardiovascular mortality in an apparently healthy population.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In myocardial infarction patients, heart rate-adjusted QT interval (QTc), an electrocardiographic indicator of sympathetic balance, is prognostic for survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a 28-year follow-up, the association between QTc and all-cause, cardiovascular, and ischemic heart disease mortality was studied in a population of 3,091 apparently healthy Dutch civil servants and their spouses, aged 40-65 years, who participated in a medical examination during 1953-1954. Moderate (QTc, 420-440 msec) and extensive (QTc, more than 440 msec) QTc prolongations significantly predict all-cause mortality during the first 15 years among men (adjusted respective relative risks [RRs], 1.5 and 1.7) and among women (RRs, 1.7 and 1.6). In men, cardiovascular (RRs, 1.6 and 1.8) and ischemic heart disease mortality (RRs, 1.8 and 2.1) mainly account for this association. In women, the association cannot be attributed specifically to cardiovascular and ischemic heart disease mortality. RRs for a subpopulation without any sign of heart disease at baseline are similar. The same is observed for QTc prolongation after light exercise, although in this situation most associations are not statistically significant, probably because of smaller numbers in the QTc prolongation categories. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that QTc contributes independently to cardiovascular risk. If autonomic imbalance is an important mechanism, it might be speculated that changes in life-style (e.g., with regard to physical exercise and smoking) may have a preventive impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poirier, P., Giles, T. D., Bray, G. A., Hong, Y., Stern, J. S., Pi-Sunyer, F. X., & Eckel, R. H. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.171016 · Cited by 3,165
Zipes, D. P., Camm, A. J., Borggrefe, M., Buxton, A. E., Chaitman, B., Fromer, M., Gregoratos, G., Klein, G., Moss, A. J., Myerburg, R. J., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.178233 · Cited by 1,080
Prolonged QTc Interval and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in a Population of Older Adults
Straus, S. M. J. M., Kors, J. A., De Bruin, M. L., van der Hooft, C. S., Hofman, A., Heeringa, J., Deckers, J. W., Kingma, J. H., Sturkenboom, M. C. J. M., Stricker, B. H. C., et al. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.067 · Cited by 833
Diurnal pattern of QTc interval: How long is prolonged?
Molnar, J., Zhang, F., Weiss, J., Ehlert, F. A., & Rosenthal, J. E. (1996) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00426-2 · Cited by 312
Mechanisms of abnormal cardiac repolarization during insulin-induced hypoglycemia
Robinson, R. T. C. E., Harris, N. D., Ireland, R. H., Lee, S., Newman, C., & Heller, S. R. (2003) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.6.1469 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Schouten, E. G., Dekker, J. M., Meppelink, P., Kok, F. J., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Pool, J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1516-1523
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2094126916
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QT interval prolongation predicts cardiovascular mortality in an apparently healthy population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.84.4.1516
- The paper
- Schouten, E. G., Dekker, J. M., Meppelink, P., Kok, F. J., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Pool, J. (1991). QT interval prolongation predicts cardiovascular mortality in an apparently healthy population. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.84.4.1516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.