Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myocardial viability in patients with Q wave myocardial infarction and no residual ischemia.

Open access
Montalescot, G, Faraggi, M, Drobinski, G, Messian, O, Evans, J, Grosgogeat, Y, Thomas, D·1992·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization in patients with persistent angina after myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of recurrent angina pectoris and myocardial infarction and improves left ventricular function. The results of revascularization after a Q wave myocardial infarction when there is no residual ischemia may depend on myocardial viability. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine whether there was viable myocardium in the infarct area in the absence of clinical and scintigraphic evidence of myocardial ischemia, 15 asymptomatic patients with a Q wave myocardial infarction, no redistribution on stress 201Tl test, and single-vessel disease (greater than 70% stenosis) with persistent anterograde blood flow were randomized to percutaneous transluminal coronary artery angioplasty (PTCA) or conservative medical treatment. After 2 months of follow-up, mean coronary blood flow measured by Doppler catheter in the infarct-related artery was higher in the PTCA treatment group (33 +/- 6 ml/min, n = 8) than in the conservative treatment group (16 +/- 4 ml/min, n = 7; p less than 0.05 between groups). The 201Tl pathological-to-normal ratios measured on postexercise images did not change in patients treated conservatively during the follow-up period (delta = +1.1 +/- 2.2%; NS from baseline) but increased significantly in patients treated by PTCA (delta = +8.5 +/- 2.3%; p less than 0.01 from baseline; p less than 0.05 between groups). Segmental wall motion improved on left ventricular angiography 2 months after PTCA (delta = +11.5 +/- 2.2%; p less than 0.001 from baseline) significantly more than in the conservative treatment group (delta = +4.1 +/- 1.4%; p less than 0.05 between both groups). Improvements of 201Tl ratios and segmental wall motion indexes correlated significantly (r = 0.73, p = 0.002). The mild improvement of global left ventricular ejection fraction measured in the PTCA treatment group did not differ significantly from changes in the conservative treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Successful angioplasty of the stenotic infarct artery in patients with a Q wave myocardial infarction and no residual ischemia improved coronary flow, 201Tl uptake in the infarct area, and regional wall motion. Therefore, myocardial viability may last several weeks, as long as residual blood flow persists in the infarct-related artery. Optimal assessment of viability by imaging techniques should identify patients who are most likely to benefit from revascularization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.86.1.47

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Montalescot, G., Faraggi, M., Drobinski, G., Messian, O., Evans, J., Grosgogeat, Y., & Thomas, D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1992-07
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
47-55
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1989017709
Cited by
276
References
15
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myocardial viability in patients with Q wave myocardial infarction and no residual ischemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.86.1.47
The paper
Montalescot, G., Faraggi, M., Drobinski, G., Messian, O., Evans, J., Grosgogeat, Y., & Thomas, D. (1992). Myocardial viability in patients with Q wave myocardial infarction and no residual ischemia. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.86.1.47

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.