Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 613

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Different secretion patterns of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with congestive heart failure.

Yoshimura, M, Yasue, H, Okumura, K, Ogawa, H, Jougasaki, M, Mukoyama, M, Nakao, K, Imura, H·1993·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are increased in relation to the severity of congestive heart failure (CHF). This study was designed to examine whether the secretion patterns of ANP and BNP vary with underlying cardiac disorders of CHF with different degrees of overload in atria and ventricles. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured plasma levels of ANP and BNP in the aorta in 20 patients with mitral stenosis (MS) in whom atria are mainly overloaded, 30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in whom both atria and ventricles are overloaded, and 20 control subjects during cardiac catheterization. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was significantly higher in the MS and DCM groups (16.7 +/- 4.7 mm Hg and 15.1 +/- 7.7 mm Hg, respectively) than in the control group (7.2 +/- 1.1 mm Hg, p < 0.01), whereas there was no significant difference between the MS and DCM groups. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was significantly higher in the DCM group than in the MS group (16.4 +/- 7.8 mm Hg versus 7.6 +/- 2.0 mm Hg, p < 0.01), and the level was comparable between the MS and control groups (7.6 +/- 2.0 mm Hg versus 6.8 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, p = NS). The plasma ANP level was significantly higher in the MS and DCM groups (356 +/- 169 pg/ml and 331 +/- 323 pg/ml, respectively) than in the control group (98 +/- 41 pg/ml, p < 0.01), whereas there was no significant difference between the MS and DCM groups. The plasma BNP level was significantly higher in the DCM group than in the MS group (333 +/- 405 pg/ml versus 147 +/- 54 pg/ml, p < 0.01), and the level was significantly higher in the MS group than in the control group (147 +/- 54 pg/ml versus < 10 pg/ml, p < 0.01). The plasma levels of ANP and BNP had a highly positive correlation with PCWP in the DCM group (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in the MS group, the plasma ANP level had a highly significant correlation with PCWP (p < 0.01) but the plasma BNP level did not. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that plasma levels of BNP mainly reflect the degree of ventricular overload and that the secretion patterns of ANP and BNP vary with underlying cardiac disorders of CHF with different degrees of overload in atria and ventricles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.87.2.464

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 613

Metadata

Authors
Yoshimura, M., Yasue, H., Okumura, K., Ogawa, H., Jougasaki, M., Mukoyama, M., Nakao, K., & Imura, H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1993-02
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
464-469
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2085065650
Cited by
613
References
0
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different secretion patterns of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with congestive heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.87.2.464
The paper
Yoshimura, M., Yasue, H., Okumura, K., Ogawa, H., Jougasaki, M., Mukoyama, M., Nakao, K., & Imura, H. (1993). Different secretion patterns of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.87.2.464

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.