Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dispersion of the QT interval. A marker of therapeutic efficacy in the idiopathic long QT syndrome.

Open access
Priori, S G, Napolitano, C, Diehl, L, Schwartz, P J·1994·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: QT interval dispersion, measured as interlead variability of QT, is a marker of dispersion of ventricular repolarization and, hence, of cardiac electrical instability. We tested the hypothesis that dispersion of ventricular repolarization may be differently affected by interventions destined to provide complete or incomplete protection against malignant arrhythmias in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS). Twenty-eight patients affected by the Romano Ward form of LQTS entered the study and were divided into three groups: LQTS patients before institution of therapy, patients who did respond to beta-blocker therapy, and patients who continued to have syncope and cardiac arrest despite beta-blockade and who underwent left cardiac sympathetic denervation. A group of 15 healthy volunteers served as control subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dispersion of QT and QTc were calculated using two indexes: the difference between the longest and the shortest value measured in each of the 12 ECG leads (QTmax-QTmin, QTcmax-QTcmin) and the relative dispersion of QT and QTc (standard deviation of QT/QT average x100, standard deviation of QTc/QTc average x100). Both indexes of dispersion of repolarization were higher in the LQTS patients than in control subjects; also, patients not responding to beta-blockers had a significantly higher dispersion of repolarization than responders. A cutoff value of 100 milliseconds for QTmax-QTmin had an 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity in discriminating between responders and nonresponders. A cutoff value of 6 for QT relative dispersion yielded similar results. The LQTS patients who did not respond to beta-blockade underwent left cardiac sympathetic denervation and thereafter remained asymptomatic (mean follow-up, 5 +/- 4 years). In this group, dispersion of repolarization was significantly reduced by the surgical denervation to values similar to that of the responders to beta-blockade. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that QT dispersion is a useful clinical tool to predict efficacy of antiadrenergic therapy in LQTS patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1681

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Diehl, L., & Schwartz, P. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1994-04
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
1681-1689
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2167318603
Cited by
395
References
0
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispersion of the QT interval. A marker of therapeutic efficacy in the idiopathic long QT syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1681
The paper
Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Diehl, L., & Schwartz, P. J. (1994). Dispersion of the QT interval. A marker of therapeutic efficacy in the idiopathic long QT syndrome. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1681

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.