The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective study of phobic anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease in men.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: To examine prospectively the association between self-reported symptoms of phobic anxiety and subsequent risk of coronary heart disease, a 2-year follow-up study was conducted of a cohort of 33,999 US male health professionals, aged 42 to 77 years in 1988, who were free of diagnosed cardiovascular disease at baseline. Levels of phobic anxiety were assessed using the Crown-Crisp index, a short, diagnostic self-rating scale used for common phobias. Main outcomes were incidents of coronary heart disease consisting of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight incident cases of CHD occurred during 2 years of follow-up (128 cases of nonfatal MI and 40 cases of fatal CHD). The age-adjusted relative risk of fatal CHD among men with highest levels of phobic anxiety (scoring 4 or higher on the Crown-Crisp index) was 3.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.31 to 6.90) compared with men with the lowest levels of anxiety (scoring 0 or 1 on the phobia index). Risk of fatal CHD increased with levels of phobic anxiety (P trend = .002). When fatal CHD was further categorized into sudden and nonsudden coronary death, the excess risk was confined to sudden death (relative risk among men scoring 3 or higher on the phobia index was 6.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.35 to 15.73). No association was found between phobic anxiety and risk of nonfatal MI. These findings remained essentially unchanged after adjusting for a broad range of cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity, strength, and dose-response gradient of the association, together with the consistency and biological plausibility of the experimental and epidemiologic evidence, support a strong causal association between phobic anxiety and fatal CHD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Kaplan, J. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.16.2192 · Cited by 2,846
The Neurocircuitry of Fear, Stress, and Anxiety Disorders
Shin, L. M., & Liberzon, I. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.83 · Cited by 2,083
Brosschot, J. F., Gerin, W., & Thayer, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.074 · Cited by 1,643
Gallo, L. C., & Matthews, K. A. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.10 · Cited by 1,366
Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: new perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., McGuire, L., Robles, T. F., & Glaser, R. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135217 · Cited by 1,176
Metadata
- Authors
- Kawachi, I., Colditz, G. A., Ascherio, A., Rimm, E. B., Giovannucci, E., Stampfer, M. J., & Willett, W. C.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1992-1997
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2100724036
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective study of phobic anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease in men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.89.5.1992
- The paper
- Kawachi, I., Colditz, G. A., Ascherio, A., Rimm, E. B., Giovannucci, E., Stampfer, M. J., & Willett, W. C. (1994). Prospective study of phobic anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.5.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.