The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown that radiofrequency ablation can terminate atrial flutter and prevent recurrences. However, different methods have been used, and the current experience remains limited. The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of atrial tissue in patients with atrial flutter using an anatomically guided approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: We treated 22 patients aged 30 to 73 years. Atrial flutter was recurrent for a mean of 5 years despite the administration of multiple antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency current was directed to the atrial isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid ring, regardless of the morphology of local electrograms. Radiofrequency energy was applied during typical atrial flutter in 12 patients, atypical atrial flutter in 2 patients, and successively both forms in 8 patients. In 19 patients, atrial flutter abruptly terminated. In 3 patients, atrial flutter persisted despite 37, 48, and 25 applications, respectively. Atrial recordings demonstrated that atrial flutter termination occurred as a consequence of conduction block at the site of radiofrequency energy application, regardless of the type of atrial flutter. The number of applications before termination ranged from 1 to 82 (mean, 32). Atrial flutter could no longer be induced in every case. There were no complications. During a 13-month mean follow-up, atrial flutter recurred in only 2 of the 19 patients who had a successful ablation. Four patients experienced chronic atrial fibrillation, and 2 of them returned to sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter using anatomic guidance is feasible and effective. Further experience is needed to delineate its role as an alternative approach to the management of refractory atrial flutter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Saoudi, N., Cosío, F., Waldo, A., Chen, S. A., Iesaka, Y., Lesh, M., Saksena, S., Salerno, J., & Schoels, W. (2001) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2658 · Cited by 464
Natale, A., Newby, K. H., Pisanó, E., Leonelli, F., Fanelli, R., Potenza, D., Beheiry, S., & Tomassoni, G. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00635-5 · Cited by 414
Poty, H., Saoudi, N., Nair, M., Anselme, F., & Letac, B. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3204 · Cited by 295
Schwartzman, D., Callans, D. J., Gottlieb, C. D., Dillon, S. M., Movsowitz, C., & Marchlinski, F. E. (1996) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00345-2 · Cited by 197
Collins, K. K., Love, B. A., Walsh, E. P., Saul, J. P., Epstein, M. R., & Triedman, J. K. (2000) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01132-2 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkorian, G., Moncada, E., Chevalier, P., Canu, G., Claudel, J. P., Bellon, C., Lyon, L., & Touboul, P.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2804-2814
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1988773405
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2804
- The paper
- Kirkorian, G., Moncada, E., Chevalier, P., Canu, G., Claudel, J. P., Bellon, C., Lyon, L., & Touboul, P. (1994). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.