Cited by 414Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter

Open access
Natale, Andrea, Newby, Keith H, Pisanó, Ennio, Leonelli, Fabio, Fanelli, Raffaele, Potenza, Domenico, Beheiry, Salwa, Tomassoni, Gery·2000·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Despite the high success rate of radiofrequency (RF) ablation, pharmacologic therapy is still considered the standard initial therapeutic approach for atrial flutter.Objective We prospectively compared the outcome at follow-up of patients with atrial flutter randomly assigned to drug therapy or RF ablation.Methods Patients with at least two episodes of symptomatic atrial flutter in the last four months were randomized to regimens of either antiarrhythmic drug therapy or first-line RF ablation. After institution of therapy, end points included recurrence of atrial flutter, rehospitalization and quality of life.Results A total of 61 patients entered the study, 30 of whom were randomized to drug therapy and 31 to RF ablation. After a mean follow-up of 21 +/- 11 months, 11 of 30 (36%) patients receiving drugs were in sinus rhythm, versus 25 of 31 (80%) patients who underwent RF ablation (p < 0.01). Of the patients receiving drugs, 63% required one or more rehospitalizations, whereas post-RF ablation, only 22% of patients were rehospitalized (p < 0.01). Following RF ablation, 29% of patients developed atrial fibrillation which was seen in 53% of patients receiving medications (p < 0.05). Sense of well being (pre-RF 2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. post-RF 3.8 +/- 0.5, p < 0.01) and function in daily life (pre-RF 2.3 +/- 0.4 vs. post-RF 3.6 +/- 0.6, p < 0.01) improved after ablation, but did not change significantly in patients treated with drugs.Conclusion In a selected group of patients with atrial flutter, RF ablation could be considered a first-line therapy due to the better success rate and impact on quality of life, the lower occurrence of atrial fibrillation and the lower need for rehospitalization at follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00635-5

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cauchemez B, Haissaguerre M, Fischer B, et al. Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of the IVC-TA isthmus in common atrial flutter. Circulation 1996;93:284 -94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Natale, A., Newby, K. H., Pisanó, E., Leonelli, F., Fanelli, R., Potenza, D., Beheiry, S., & Tomassoni, G.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Natale, Andrea
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1898-1904
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040907740
Cited by
414
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
atrial flutter, radiofrequency catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs, first-line therapy, atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia recurrence, hospital readmission, quality of life, sinus rhythm maintenance
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Flutter, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review