Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 689

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns of Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease: A Statistical Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography in 1155 Lesions

Mintz, Gary S., Popma, Jeffrey J., Pichard, Augusto D., Kent, Kenneth M., Satler, Lowell F., Chuang, Ya Chien, Ditrano, Christine J., Leon, Martin B.·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Target lesion calcium is a marker for significant coronary artery disease and a determinant of the success of transcatheter therapy. Methods and Results Eleven hundred fifty-five native vessel target lesions in 1117 patients were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary angiography. The presence, magnitude, location, and distribution of IVUS calcium were analyzed and compared with the detection and classification (none/mild, moderate, and severe) by angiography. Angiography detected calcium in 440 of 1155 lesions (38%): 306 (26%) moderate calcium and 134 (12%) severe. IVUS detected lesion calcium in 841 of 1155 (73%, P <.0001 versus angiography). The mean arc of lesion calcium measured 115±110°; the mean length measured 3.5±3.7 mm. Target lesion calcium was only superficial in 48%, only deep in 28%, and both superficial and deep in 24%. The mean arc of superficial calcium measured 85±108°; the mean length measured 2.4±3.4 mm. Three hundred seventy-three of 1155 reference segments (32%) contained calcium ( P <.0001 compared with lesion site). The mean arc of reference calcium measured 42±80°; the mean length measured 1.7±3.6 mm. Only 44 (4%) had reference calcium in the absence of lesion calcium. Angiographic detection and classification of calcium depended on arcs, lengths, location, and distribution of lesion and reference segment calcium. By discriminant analysis, the classification function for predicting angiographic calcium included the arc of target lesion calcium, the arc of superficial calcium, the length of reference segment calcium, and the location of calcium within the lesion. This model correctly predicted the angiographic detection of calcification in 74.4% of lesions and the angiographic classification (none/moderate/severe) of calcium in 62.8% of lesions. Conclusions IVUS detected calcium in >70% of lesions, significantly more often than standard angiography. Although angiography is moderately sensitive for the detection of extensive lesion calcium (sensitivity, 60% and 85% for three- and four-quadrant calcium, respectively), it is less sensitive for the presence of milder degrees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1959

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 689

Metadata

Authors
Mintz, G. S., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Kent, K. M., Satler, L. F., Chuang, Y. C., Ditrano, C. J., & Leon, M. B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-04
Volume
91
Issue
7
Pages
1959-1965
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2019029236
Cited by
689
References
1
FWCI
23.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease: A Statistical Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography in 1155 Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1959
The paper
Mintz, G. S., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Kent, K. M., Satler, L. F., Chuang, Y. C., Ditrano, C. J., & Leon, M. B. (1995). Patterns of Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease: A Statistical Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography in 1155 Lesions. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1959

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.