The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Anomalous Coronary Arteries: A New Gold Standard for Delineating the Proximal Course?
Abstract
Background The clinical significance of anomalously originating coronary arteries depends on their proximal course. Diagnosis of this course by conventional x-ray coronary angiography alone may be equivocal. We postulated that with fast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, accurate detection of anomalous coronary arteries and unambiguous delineation of their proximal course is feasible. Methods and Results In a selected group of 38 patients, 19 of them having an anomalously originating coronary artery, a fast MR angiographic technique was used to study the proximal coronary anatomy. Blinded analysis of randomly ordered MR studies was performed independently by two observers. Both origin and proximal course of the coronary arteries were defined. Two cardiologists reviewed all x-ray coronary angiograms. After the separate analyses, a final consensus result was defined for each patient. In 37 patients, successful MR coronary angiography could be performed. Interobserver agreement for determining both origin and proximal course was 100%. An x-ray coronary angiogram was available in 36 patients. In 3 patients (all with an anomalous left main coronary artery originating from the right aortic sinus), there was disagreement about the proximal course between the results of MR and x-ray coronary angiography. Review of these cases demonstrated that MR angiography had unambiguously visualized the proximal coronary artery course, whereas the results of x-ray angiography had been equivocal. Thus, sensitivity and specificity for detecting anomalous coronary arteries and delineating their proximal course were 100%. Conclusions These data suggest that fast MR angiography is highly accurate in determining the origin and delineating the proximal course of anomalous coronary arteries, even in those cases in which x-ray coronary angiographic diagnosis is difficult or even erroneous.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sudden Death in Young Athletes
Maron, B. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022783 · Cited by 1,394
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Achenbach, S., Moshage, W., Ropers, D., Nossen, J., & Daniel, W. G. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199812313392702 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Post, J. C., van Rossum, A. C., Bronzwaer, J. G. F., de Cock, C. C., Hofman, M. B. M., Valk, J., & Visser, C. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3163-3171
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2088608110
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Anomalous Coronary Arteries: A New Gold Standard for Delineating the Proximal Course? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3163
- The paper
- Post, J. C., van Rossum, A. C., Bronzwaer, J. G. F., de Cock, C. C., Hofman, M. B. M., Valk, J., & Visser, C. A. (1995). Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Anomalous Coronary Arteries: A New Gold Standard for Delineating the Proximal Course? Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.