The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Invasive Techniques
Abstract
Background In the patient with mitral regurgitation who is being considered for valvular surgery, cardiac catheterization is usually performed to quantify the severity of regurgitation and to determine its influence on left ventricular volumes and systolic function. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) potentially provides a rapid, noninvasive method of acquiring these data. Thus, this study was done to determine whether MRI can reliably measure the magnitude of mitral regurgitation and evaluate the effect of regurgitation on left ventricular volumes and systolic function. Methods and Results Twenty-three subjects (14 women and 9 men 15 to 72 years of age) with (n=17) or without (n=6) mitral regurgitation underwent MRI scanning followed immediately by cardiac catheterization. The presence (or absence) of valvular regurgitation was determined, and left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction were quantified during each procedure. There was excellent correlation between invasive and MRI assessments of left ventricular end-diastolic (r=.95) and end-systolic (r=.95) volumes and regurgitant fraction (r=.96). All MRI examinations were completed in <28 minutes. Conclusions In the patient with mitral regurgitation, MRI compares favorably with cardiac catheterization for assessment of the magnitude of regurgitation and its influence on left ventricular volumes and systolic function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle.
Grossman, W., Jones, D., & McLaurin, L. P. (1975) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci108079 · Cited by 2,403
Cited by
Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Chatterjee, K., de Leon, A. C., Faxon, D. P., Freed, M. D., Gaasch, W. H., Lytle, B. W., Nishimura, R. A., O'Gara, P. T., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007 · Cited by 2,257
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Chatterjee, K., de Leon, A. C., Faxon, D. P., Freed, M. D., Gaasch, W. H., Lytle, B. W., Nishimura, R. A., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.190748 · Cited by 1,114
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Cardiovascular Flow Measurement with Phase-Contrast MR Imaging: Basic Facts and Implementation
Lotz, J., Meier, C., Leppert, A., & Galanski, M. (2002) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651 · Cited by 673
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Hundley, W. G., Bluemke, D. A., Finn, J. P., Flamm, S. D., Fogel, M. A., Friedrich, M. G., Ho, V. B., Jerosch-Herold, M., Kramer, C. M., Manning, W. J., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011 · Cited by 593
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hundley, W. G., Li, H. F., Willard, J. E., Landau, C., Lange, R. A., Meshack, B. M., Hillis, L. D., & Peshock, R. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1151-1158
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2060241869
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Invasive Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1151
- The paper
- Hundley, W. G., Li, H. F., Willard, J. E., Landau, C., Lange, R. A., Meshack, B. M., Hillis, L. D., & Peshock, R. M. (1995). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Invasive Techniques. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.