Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Invasive Techniques

Hundley, W. Gregory, Li, Hong F., Willard, John E., Landau, Charles, Lange, Richard A., Meshack, Benjamin M., Hillis, L. David, Peshock, Ronald M.·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background In the patient with mitral regurgitation who is being considered for valvular surgery, cardiac catheterization is usually performed to quantify the severity of regurgitation and to determine its influence on left ventricular volumes and systolic function. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) potentially provides a rapid, noninvasive method of acquiring these data. Thus, this study was done to determine whether MRI can reliably measure the magnitude of mitral regurgitation and evaluate the effect of regurgitation on left ventricular volumes and systolic function. Methods and Results Twenty-three subjects (14 women and 9 men 15 to 72 years of age) with (n=17) or without (n=6) mitral regurgitation underwent MRI scanning followed immediately by cardiac catheterization. The presence (or absence) of valvular regurgitation was determined, and left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction were quantified during each procedure. There was excellent correlation between invasive and MRI assessments of left ventricular end-diastolic (r=.95) and end-systolic (r=.95) volumes and regurgitant fraction (r=.96). All MRI examinations were completed in <28 minutes. Conclusions In the patient with mitral regurgitation, MRI compares favorably with cardiac catheterization for assessment of the magnitude of regurgitation and its influence on left ventricular volumes and systolic function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1151

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Hundley, W. G., Li, H. F., Willard, J. E., Landau, C., Lange, R. A., Meshack, B. M., Hillis, L. D., & Peshock, R. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-09
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
1151-1158
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2060241869
Cited by
229
References
2
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Invasive Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1151
The paper
Hundley, W. G., Li, H. F., Willard, J. E., Landau, C., Lange, R. A., Meshack, B. M., Hillis, L. D., & Peshock, R. M. (1995). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Invasive Techniques. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.