The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective 12-Year Follow-up Study of Clinical and Hemodynamic Sequelae After Deep Vein Thrombosis in Low-Risk Patients (Zürich Study)
Abstract
Background No prospective study of the long-term sequelae of more than 10 years after acute deep vein thrombosis exists so far. Therefore, 58 low-risk patients with DVT were included in a prospective study to evaluate the natural history of postthrombotic syndrome. Methods and Results Clinical and hemodynamic examinations were performed at the time of admission; after 3, 6, and 12 months; after the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th years; and finally after the 12th year. All patients received heparin initially and oral anticoagulants subsequently. After 12 years, 64% of the patients exhibited normal findings. Mild skin changes were found in 28%, marked trophic changes in 5%, and only one venous ulcer occurred. Regular use of compression stockings was reported by 54% of the patients with multilevel thrombosis. Although mean maximum venous outflow was significantly reduced from the acute event to 12 years later ( P <.003) compared with the contralateral leg, a significant ( P <.05) improvement was observed 6 months later. Recanalization of calf vein thrombosis was detected by Doppler sonography after 3 months. Sixty-four percent of the multilevel thromboses were recanalized completely or in part after 1 year; in 69%, valvular incompetence was found. Conclusions In contrast to earlier reports, this prospective study up to 12 years after deep vein thrombosis demonstrates a low incidence of postthrombotic syndrome by administration of oral anticoagulants and regular compression therapy. However, the adverse clinical event rate (mortality 14%) and a recurrence rate of 24% show that the prognosis after deep vein thrombosis does not appear favorable even in low-risk patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Investigation of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: A Consensus Statement
Nicolaides, A. N. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.20.e126 · Cited by 945
Effect of patient's sex on risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.
McRae, S., Tran, H., Schulman, S., Ginsberg, J., & Kearon, C. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69110-1 · Cited by 289
Post‐thrombotic syndrome: prevalence, prognostication and need for progress
Prandoni, P., & Kahn, S. R. (2009) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07601.x · Cited by 279
Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis
Douketis, J., Tosetto, A., Marcucci, M., Baglin, T., Cosmi, B., Cushman, M., Kyrle, P., Poli, D., Tait, R. C., & Iorio, A. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d813 · Cited by 278
Heijer, M. D., Janssen, M. C. H., Vleuten, C. V. D., Thien, T., Wollersheim, H., & Roumen-Klappe, E. M. (2005) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th05-03-0146 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Franzeck, U. K., Schalch, I., Jäger, K. A., Schneider, E., Grimm, J., & Bollinger, A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-79
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2054138447
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective 12-Year Follow-up Study of Clinical and Hemodynamic Sequelae After Deep Vein Thrombosis in Low-Risk Patients (Zürich Study). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.1.74
- The paper
- Franzeck, U. K., Schalch, I., Jäger, K. A., Schneider, E., Grimm, J., & Bollinger, A. (1996). Prospective 12-Year Follow-up Study of Clinical and Hemodynamic Sequelae After Deep Vein Thrombosis in Low-Risk Patients (Zürich Study). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.1.74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.