The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Difference in Risk of Torsade de Pointes With d,l- Sotalol
Abstract
Background The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that women are more prone than men to develop torsade de pointes (TdP) in a defined cohort of patients exposed to the QT-prolonging antiarrhythmic drug d,l -sotalol. Methods and Results In a database derived from 22 clinical trials involving 3135 adult patients who received oral d,l -sotalol (median follow-up, 164 days), TdP developed in 44 (1.9%) of 2336 men and in 33 (4.1%) of 799 women ( P <.001). Logistic regression analysis identified female sex ( P <.0001), presenting arrhythmia of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation ( P <.0001), history of congestive heart failure ( P <.001), and d,l -sotalol dose >320 mg/d ( P <.001) as factors most predictive of TdP; in addition to these, a serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dL in women and >1.6 mg/dL in men was weakly predictive ( P <.05). After adjustment for these risk factors, women had threefold greater odds of developing TdP than men. The sex difference in TdP risk was age independent and could not be explained by differential dose-related bradycardic responses in women versus men. Conclusions Women are at increased risk of developing TdP during administration of d,l -sotalol. This finding needs to be taken into account, together with other TdP risk factors, when patients are treated with this antiarrhythmic agent. Given the consistency between the present and other recent observations, greater caution in women regarding use of QT-prolonging drugs, in general, is advisable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The long QT syndromes: A critical review, new clinical observations and a unifying hypothesis
Jackman, W. M., Friday, K. J., Anderson, J. L., Aliot, E. M., Clark, M., & Lazzara, R. (1988) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/0033-0620(88)90014-x · Cited by 783
Risk of cardiac events in family members of patients with long QT syndrome
Zareba, W., Moss, A. J., le Cessie, S., Locati, E. H., Robinson, J. L., Hall, W. J., & Andrews, M. L. (1995) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)60383-2 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Haverkamp*, W. (2000) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00119-x · Cited by 486
Androgen Receptors Mediate Hypertrophy in Cardiac Myocytes
Marsh, J. D., Lehmann, M. H., Ritchie, R. H., Gwathmey, J. K., Green, G. E., & Schiebinger, R. J. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.3.256 · Cited by 432
Self-citationPredicting drug–hERG channel interactions that cause acquired long QT syndrome
Sanguinetti, M. C., & Mitcheson, J. S. (2005) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2005.01.003 · Cited by 300
Gender Difference in the Cycle Length-Dependent QT and Potassium Currents in Rabbits
Liu, X.-K., Katchman, A., Drici, M.-D., Ebert, S. N., Ducic, I., Morad, M., & Woosley, R. L. (1998) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)37435-x · Cited by 209
Macrolide Antibiotics and the Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Albert, R. K., & Schuller, J. L. (2014) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201402-0385ci · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehmann, M. H., Hardy, S., Archibald, D., Quart, B., & MacNeil, D. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1996-11-15
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2535-2541
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2135884250
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Difference in Risk of Torsade de Pointes With d,l- Sotalol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.10.2535
- The paper
- Lehmann, M. H., Hardy, S., Archibald, D., Quart, B., & MacNeil, D. J. (1996). Sex Difference in Risk of Torsade de Pointes With d,l- Sotalol. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.10.2535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.