Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Arterial Baroreflex Modulation of Heart Rate in Chronic Heart Failure: Clinical and Hemodynamic Correlates and Prognostic Implications

Mortara, Andrea, La Rovere, Maria Teresa, Pinna, Gian Domenico, Prpa, Alexander, Maestri, Roberto, Febo, Oreste, Pozzoli, Massimo, Opasich, Cristina, Tavazzi, Luigi·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background In chronic heart failure (CHF), arterial baroreflex regulation of cardiac function is impaired, leading to a reduction in the tonic restraining influence on the sympathetic nervous system. Because baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), as assessed by the phenylephrine technique, significantly contributes to postinfarction risk stratification, the aim of the present study was to evaluate whether in CHF patients a depressed BRS is associated with a worse clinical hemodynamic status and unfavorable outcome. Methods and Results BRS was assessed in 282 CHF patients in sinus rhythm receiving stable medical therapy (age, 52±9 years; New York Heart Association [NYHA] class, 2.4±0.6; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 23±6%). The BRS of the entire population averaged 3.9±4.0 ms/mm Hg (mean±SD) and was significantly related to LVEF and hemodynamic parameters (LVEF, P <.005; cardiac index and pulmonary wedge pressure, P <.001 by regression analysis). Patients in NYHA classes III or IV and those with severe mitral regurgitation had markedly depressed vagal reflexes. The association of BRS with survival was described after its categorization in three groups: below the lowest quartile (<1.3 ms/mm Hg), between the lowest quartile and the median (1.3 to 3 ms/mm Hg), and above the median (>3 ms/mm Hg). During a mean follow-up of 15±12 months, 78 primary events (cardiac death, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and status 1 priority transplantation) occurred (27.6%). BRS was significantly related to outcome (log rank, 9.1; P <.01), with a relative risk of 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 4.7) for patients with the major derangement in BRS (<1.3 ms/mm Hg). At multivariate analysis, BRS was an independent predictor of death after adjustment for noninvasive known risk factors but not when hemodynamic indexes were also considered. In CHF patients with severe mitral regurgitation, however, BRS remained a strong prognostic marker independent of hemodynamic function. Conclusions In moderate to severe CHF, a depressed sensitivity of vagal reflexes parallels the deterioration of clinical and hemodynamic status and is significantly associated with poor survival. Particularly in patients with severe mitral regurgitation the baroreceptor modulation of heart rate provides prognostic information of incremental value to hemodynamic parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3450

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Mortara, A., La Rovere, M. T., Pinna, G. D., Prpa, A., Maestri, R., Febo, O., Pozzoli, M., Opasich, C., & Tavazzi, L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-11-18
Volume
96
Issue
10
Pages
3450-3458
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2093926355
Cited by
443
References
0
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arterial Baroreflex Modulation of Heart Rate in Chronic Heart Failure: Clinical and Hemodynamic Correlates and Prognostic Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3450
The paper
Mortara, A., La Rovere, M. T., Pinna, G. D., Prpa, A., Maestri, R., Febo, O., Pozzoli, M., Opasich, C., & Tavazzi, L. (1997). Arterial Baroreflex Modulation of Heart Rate in Chronic Heart Failure: Clinical and Hemodynamic Correlates and Prognostic Implications. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3450

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.