Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 703

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Significance of Mitral Regurgitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Lamas, Gervasio A., Mitchell, Gary F., Flaker, Greg C., Smith, Sidney C., Gersh, Bernard J., Basta, Lofty, Moyé, Lemuel, Braunwald, Eugene, Pfeffer, Marc A.·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) may complicate acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is not known whether mild MR is an independent predictor of post-MI outcome. Methods and Results The study cohort consisted of 727 Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Study patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, including left ventriculography, up to 16 days after MI. Left ventriculograms were analyzed for diastolic and systolic volumes, global left ventricular sphericity, extent of wall motion abnormality, and endocardial curvature. The presence of MR was related to the risk of developing a cardiovascular event during 3.5 years of follow-up. MR was present in 141 patients (19.4%). Severe (3+) MR was present in only 2 patients. Patients with MR were more likely to have a persistently occluded infarct artery (MR versus no MR, 27.3% versus 15.2%; P =.001). Although the ejection fractions were similar, MR patients had larger end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and more spherical ventricles than patients without MR. Sphericity change from diastole to systole was also significantly reduced in MR patients. Patients with MR were more likely to experience cardiovascular mortality (29% versus 12%; P <.001), severe heart failure (24% versus 16%; P =.0153), and the combined end point of cardiovascular mortality, severe heart failure, or recurrent myocardial infarction (47% versus 29%; P <.001). The presence of MR was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality (relative risk, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.04). Conclusions Mild MR is an independent predictor of post-MI mortality. As such, it adds important information for risk stratification of post-MI patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.3.827

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 703

Metadata

Authors
Lamas, G. A., Mitchell, G. F., Flaker, G. C., Smith, S. C., Gersh, B. J., Basta, L., Moyé, L., Braunwald, E., & Pfeffer, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-08-05
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
827-833
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1975124226
Cited by
703
References
3
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Significance of Mitral Regurgitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.3.827
The paper
Lamas, G. A., Mitchell, G. F., Flaker, G. C., Smith, S. C., Gersh, B. J., Basta, L., Moyé, L., Braunwald, E., & Pfeffer, M. A. (1997). Clinical Significance of Mitral Regurgitation After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.3.827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.