The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Airline Cardiac Arrest Program
Abstract
Background As many as 1000 lives are lost annually from cardiac arrest in commercial aircraft. Ventricular fibrillation (VF), the most common mechanism, can be treated effectively only with prompt defibrillation, whereas the current policy of most airlines is to continue cardiopulmonary resuscitation pending aircraft diversion. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of making semiautomatic external defibrillators (AEDs) available for use on airline passengers with cardiac arrest. Methods and Results AEDs were installed on international Qantas aircraft and at major terminals, selected crew were trained in their use, and all crew members were trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Supervision was provided by medical volunteers or (remotely) by airline physicians. During a 64-month period, AEDs were used on 109 occasions: 63 times for monitoring an acutely ill passenger and 46 times for cardiac arrest. Twenty-seven episodes of cardiac arrest occurred in aircraft, often (11 of 27 [41%]) unwitnessed, and they were usually (21 of 27 [78%]) associated with asystole or pulseless idioventricular rhythm. All 19 arrests in terminals were witnessed; VF was present in 17 (89%). Overall, defibrillation was initially successful in 21 of 23 cases (91%). Long-term survival from VF was achieved in 26% (2 of 6 in aircraft and 4 of 17 in terminals). The ability to monitor cardiac rhythm aided decisions on diversion, which was avoided in most passengers with asystole or idioventricular rhythm. Conclusions AEDs in aircraft and terminals, with appropriate crew training, are helpful in the management of cardiac emergencies. Survival from VF is practicable and is comparable with the most effective prehospital ambulance emergency services. Costly aircraft diversions can be avoided in clearly futile situations, enhancing the cost-effectiveness of the program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Incidence of Primary Cardiac Arrest during Vigorous Exercise
Siscovick, D. S., Weiss, N. S., Fletcher, R. H., & Lasky, T. (1984) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198410043111402 · Cited by 838
Cited by
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Monsieurs, K. G., Nolan, J. P., Bossaert, L. L., Greif, R., Maconochie, I. K., Nikolaou, N. I., Perkins, G. D., Soar, J., Truhlář, A., Wyllie, J., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 · Cited by 915
Use of Automated External Defibrillators by a U.S. Airline
Page, R. L., Joglar, J. A., Kowal, R. C., Zagrodzky, J. D., Nelson, L. L., Ramaswamy, K., Barbera, S. J., Hamdan, M. H., & McKenas, D. K. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200010263431702 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Rourke, M. F., Donaldson, E., & Geddes, J. S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1997-11-04
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2849-2853
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2057092474
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Airline Cardiac Arrest Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.9.2849
- The paper
- O’Rourke, M. F., Donaldson, E., & Geddes, J. S. (1997). An Airline Cardiac Arrest Program. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.9.2849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.