Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 655

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Significance of Serial Changes in Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension

Open access
Verdecchia, Paolo, Schillaci, Giuseppe, Borgioni, Claudia, Ciucci, Antonella, Gattobigio, Roberto, Zampi, Ivano, Reboldi, Gianpaolo, Porcellati, Carlo·1998·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Increased left ventricular (LV) mass predicts an adverse outcome in patients with essential hypertension. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between changes in LV mass during antihypertensive treatment and subsequent prognosis. Methods and Results —Procedures including echocardiography and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring were performed in 430 patients with essential hypertension before therapy and after 1217 patient-years. Months or years after the follow-up visit, 31 patients suffered a first cardiovascular morbid event. The patients with a decrease in LV mass from the baseline to follow-up visit were compared with those with an increase in LV mass. There were 15 events (1.78 per 100 person-years) in the group with a decrease in LV mass and 16 events (3.03 per 100 person-years) in the group with an increase in LV mass ( P =.029). In a Cox model, the lesser cardiovascular risk in the group with a decrease in LV mass (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.99) remained significant ( P =.04) after adjustment for age (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.10; P =.0008) and baseline LVH at ECG (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.78; P =.012). In that model, baseline LV mass bordered on statistical significance (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03; P =.06). In the subset with LV mass >125 g/m 2 at the baseline visit (26% of subjects), the event rate was lower among the subjects who achieved regression of LVH than in those who did not (1.58 versus 6.27 events per 100 person-years; P =.002). This difference held in the multivariate analysis (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.68). Conclusions —In essential hypertension, a reduction in LV mass during treatment is a favorable prognostic marker that predicts a lesser risk for subsequent cardiovascular morbid events. Such an association is independent of baseline LV mass, baseline clinic and ambulatory BP, and degree of BP reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.97.1.48

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 655

Metadata

Authors
Verdecchia, P., Schillaci, G., Borgioni, C., Ciucci, A., Gattobigio, R., Zampi, I., Reboldi, G., & Porcellati, C.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1998-01-13
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
48-54
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2050134576
Cited by
655
References
4
FWCI
30.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of Serial Changes in Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.97.1.48
The paper
Verdecchia, P., Schillaci, G., Borgioni, C., Ciucci, A., Gattobigio, R., Zampi, I., Reboldi, G., & Porcellati, C. (1998). Prognostic Significance of Serial Changes in Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.1.48

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.