The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnitude and Time Course of Microvascular Obstruction and Tissue Injury After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Open accessAbstract
Background —Microvascular obstruction within an area of myocardial infarction indicates worse functional recovery and a higher risk of postinfarction complications. After prolonged coronary occlusion, contrast-enhanced MRI identifies myocardial infarction as a hyperenhanced region containing a hypoenhanced core. Because the time course of microvascular obstruction after infarction/reperfusion is unknown, we examined whether microvascular obstruction reaches its full extent shortly after reperfusion or shows significant progression over the following 2 days. Methods and Results —Seven dogs underwent 90-minute balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) followed by reflow. Gadolinium-DTPA–enhanced MRI performed at 2, 6, and 48 hours after reperfusion was compared with radioactive microsphere blood flow (MBF) measurements and myocardial staining to define microvascular obstruction (thioflavin S) and infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium chloride, TTC). The MRI hypoenhanced region increased 3-fold during 48 hours after reperfusion (3.2±1.8%, 6.7±4.4%, and 9.9±3.2% of left ventricular mass at 2, 6, and 48 hours, respectively, P <0.03) and correlated well with microvascular obstruction (MBF <50% of remote region, r =0.99 and thioflavin S, r =0.93). MRI hyperenhancement also increased (21.7±4.0%, 24.3±4.6%, and 28.8±5.1% at 2, 6, and 48 hours, P <0.006) and correlated well with infarct size by TTC ( r =0.92). The microvascular obstruction/infarct size ratio increased from 13.0±4.8% to 22.6±8.9% and to 30.4±4.2% over 48 hours ( P =0.024). Conclusions —The extent of microvascular obstruction and the infarct size increase significantly over the first 48 hours after myocardial infarction. These results are consistent with progressive microvascular and myocardial injury well beyond coronary occlusion and reflow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog
Kloner, R. A., Ganote, C. E., & Jennings, R. B. (1974) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci107898 · Cited by 1,842
Cited by
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target
Hausenloy, D. J., & Yellon, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci62874 · Cited by 2,357
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Amado, L. C., Gerber, B. L., Gupta, S. N., Rettmann, D. W., Szarf, G., Schock, R., Nasir, K., Kraitchman, D. L., & Lima, J. A. C. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.020 · Cited by 508
Self-citationWeir, R. A. P., Murphy, C. A., Petrie, C. J., Martin, T. N., Balmain, S., Clements, S., Steedman, T., Wagner, G. S., Dargie, H. J., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2010) · Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1161/circimaging.109.897439 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochitte, C. E., Lima, J. A. C., Bluemke, D. A., Reeder, S. B., McVeigh, E. R., Furuta, T., Becker, L. C., & Melin, J. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-09-08
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1006-1014
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2170774676
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnitude and Time Course of Microvascular Obstruction and Tissue Injury After Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.98.10.1006
- The paper
- Rochitte, C. E., Lima, J. A. C., Bluemke, D. A., Reeder, S. B., McVeigh, E. R., Furuta, T., Becker, L. C., & Melin, J. A. (1998). Magnitude and Time Course of Microvascular Obstruction and Tissue Injury After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.10.1006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.