The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inverse Relationship Between Electrode Size and Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Ablation With Active Electrode Cooling
Abstract
Background —Clinical efficacy has driven the use of larger electrodes (7F, length ≥4 mm) for radiofrequency ablation, which reduces electrogram resolution and causes variability in tissue contact depending on electrode orientation. With active cooling, ablation electrode size may be reduced. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of electrode length on tissue temperature and lesion size with saline irrigation used for active cooling. Methods and Results —In 11 anesthetized dogs, the thigh muscle was exposed and bathed with heparinized canine blood. A 7F ablation catheter with a 2- or 5-mm irrigated tip electrode was positioned perpendicular or parallel to the thigh muscle. Radiofrequency current was delivered at constant voltage (50 V) for 30 seconds during saline irrigation (20 mL/min) to 148 sites. Tissue temperature at depths of 3.5 and 7 mm and lesion size were measured. In the perpendicular electrode-tissue orientation, radiofrequency applications at 50 V with the 2-mm electrode compared with the 5-mm electrode resulted in lower power at 50 V (26 versus 36 W) but higher tissue temperatures, larger lesion depth (8.0 versus 5.4 mm), and greater diameter (12.4 mm versus 8.4 mm). Also, in the parallel orientation, overall power was lower with the 2-mm electrode (25 versus 33 W), but tissue temperatures were higher and lesions were deeper (7.3 versus 6.9 mm). Lesion diameter was similar (11.1 versus 11.3 mm) for both electrodes. Conclusions —The smaller electrode resulted in transmission of a greater fraction of the radiofrequency power to the tissue and resulted in higher tissue temperature, larger lesions, and lower dependency of lesion size on the electrode orientation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jackman, W. M., Wang, X., Friday, K. J., Roman, C. A., Moulton, K. P., Beckman, K. J., McClelland, J. H., Twidale, N., Hazlitt, H. A., Prior, M. I., et al. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199106063242301 · Cited by 1,422
Self-citation
Cited by
Yokoyama, K., Nakagawa, H., Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Leo, G., Aeby, N., Ikeda, A., Pitha, J. V., Sharma, T., Lazzara, R., et al. (2008) · Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.108.803650 · Cited by 624
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakagawa, H., Wittkampf, F. H. M., Yamanashi, W. S., Pitha, J. V., Imai, S., Campbell, B., Arruda, M., Lazzara, R., & Jackman, W. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-08-04
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 458-465
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2089333822
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inverse Relationship Between Electrode Size and Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Ablation With Active Electrode Cooling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.98.5.458
- The paper
- Nakagawa, H., Wittkampf, F. H. M., Yamanashi, W. S., Pitha, J. V., Imai, S., Campbell, B., Arruda, M., Lazzara, R., & Jackman, W. M. (1998). Inverse Relationship Between Electrode Size and Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Ablation With Active Electrode Cooling. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.5.458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.