The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repolarizing K + Currents I TO1 and I Ks Are Larger in Right Than Left Canine Ventricular Midmyocardium
Open accessAbstract
Background —The ventricular action potential exhibits regional heterogeneity in configuration and duration (APD). Across the left ventricular (LV) free wall, this is explained by differences in repolarizing K + currents. However, the ionic basis of electrical nonuniformity in the right ventricle (RV) versus the LV is poorly investigated. We examined transient outward ( I TO1 ), delayed ( I Ks and I Kr ), and inward rectifier K + currents ( I K1 ) in relation to action potential characteristics of RV and LV midmyocardial (M) cells of the same adult canine hearts. Methods and Results —Single RV and LV M cells were used for microelectrode recordings and whole-cell voltage clamping. Action potentials showed deeper notches, shorter APDs at 50% and 95% of repolarization, and less prolongation on slowing of the pacing rate in RV than LV. I TO1 density was significantly larger in RV than LV, whereas steady-state inactivation and rate of recovery were similar. I Ks tail currents, measured at −25 mV and insensitive to almokalant (2 μmol/L), were considerably larger in RV than LV. I Kr , measured as almokalant-sensitive tail currents at −50 mV, and I K1 were not different in the 2 ventricles. Conclusions —Differences in K + currents may well explain the interventricular heterogeneity of action potentials in M layers of the canine heart. These results contribute to a further phenotyping of the ventricular action potential under physiological conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Potse, M., Dube, B., Richer, J., Vinet, A., & Gulrajani, R. M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.880875 · Cited by 470
Electrical heterogeneity within the ventricular wall
Antzelevitch, C., & Fish, J. (2001) · Basic Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s003950170002 · Cited by 334
Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications.
Lopez-Perez, A., Sebastian, R., & Ferrero, J. M. (2015) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-015-0033-5 · Cited by 151
Lacroix, D. (2002) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00236-5 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Volders, P. G. A., Sipido, K. R., Carmeliet, E., Spätjens, R. L. H. M. G., Wellens, H. J. J., & Vos, M. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-01-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-210
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2092055670
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repolarizing K + Currents I TO1 and I Ks Are Larger in Right Than Left Canine Ventricular Midmyocardium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.99.2.206
- The paper
- Volders, P. G. A., Sipido, K. R., Carmeliet, E., Spätjens, R. L. H. M. G., Wellens, H. J. J., & Vos, M. A. (1999). Repolarizing K + Currents I TO1 and I Ks Are Larger in Right Than Left Canine Ventricular Midmyocardium. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.2.206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.