The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Coronary Artery Definition With T2-Weighted, Free-Breathing, Three-Dimensional Coronary MRA
Abstract
Background —Three-dimensional (3D) navigator-gated and prospectively corrected free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) allows for submillimeter image resolution but suffers from poor contrast between coronary blood and myocardium. Data collected over >100 ms/heart beat are also susceptible to bulk cardiac and respiratory motion. To address these problems, we examined the effect of a T2 preparation prepulse (T2prep) for myocardial suppression and a shortened acquisition window on coronary definition. Methods and Results —Eight healthy adult subjects and 5 patients with confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent free-breathing 3D MRA with and without T2prep and with 120- and 60-ms data-acquisition windows. The T2prep resulted in a 123% ( P <0.001) increase in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Coronary edge definition was improved by 33% ( P <0.001). Acquisition window shortening from 120 to 60 ms resulted in better vessel definition (11%; P <0.001). Among patients with CAD, there was a good correspondence with disease. Conclusions —Free-breathing, T2prep, 3D coronary MRA with a shorter acquisition window resulted in improved CNR and better coronary artery definition, allowing the assessment of coronary disease. This approach offers the potential for free-breathing, noninvasive assessment of the major coronary arteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
Saam, T., Hatsukami, T. S., Takaya, N., Chu, B., Underhill, H., Kerwin, W. S., Cai, J., Ferguson, M. S., & Yuan, C. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2441051769 · Cited by 331
Stuber, M., Botnar, R. M., Danias, P. G., Sodickson, D. K., Kissinger, K. V., Van Cauteren, M., De Becker, J., & Manning, W. J. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00223-5 · Cited by 320
Self-citationKim, W. Y., Stuber, M., Börnert, P., Kissinger, K. V., Manning, W. J., & Botnar, R. M. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000025629.85631.1e · Cited by 302
Self-citationDe Backer, G., Ambrosioni, E., Broch-Johnsen, K., Brotons, C., Cifkova, R., Dallongeville, J., Ebrahim, S., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Mancia, G., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00149831-200312001-00001 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Botnar, R. M., Stuber, M., Danias, P. G., Kissinger, K. V., & Manning, W. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-06-22
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3139-3148
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2036115983
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Coronary Artery Definition With T2-Weighted, Free-Breathing, Three-Dimensional Coronary MRA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.99.24.3139
- The paper
- Botnar, R. M., Stuber, M., Danias, P. G., Kissinger, K. V., & Manning, W. J. (1999). Improved Coronary Artery Definition With T2-Weighted, Free-Breathing, Three-Dimensional Coronary MRA. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.24.3139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.